User talk:Nalinnishant9

February 2020

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. DMacks (talk) 14:49, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Baal veer links are for information purpose

@DMacks I only added the content which is not available on Wikipedia. Sometimes readers are searching for this information for better understanding. for example I added the link on Baal veer which contains all the episodes name and release dates of that episodes. i know that this will not help me in my search ranking. i am doing this for adding more information.

Your behavior appears to be WP:REFSPAM for (presumably) your blog, and anyway not a WP:RS. DMacks (talk) 04:06, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Torch (browser). Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. - Ahunt (talk) 14:50, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. DMacks (talk) 18:40, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

i will promise you this will not happen again

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nalinnishant9 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hey @DMacks I humble request you to please unblock my website from Wikipedia. I promise you that I will never ever post my website link here again.. please unblock it because it negatively affects my SEO and hopes you know that achieving Good ranking in SEO takes a lot of works and time. so please unblock my website I am leaving Wikipedia for forever.

Decline reason:

Your SEO is of no concern to Wikipedia. stwalkerster (talk) 10:58, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.