User talk:Naftalig

Welcome!

Hello, Naftalig, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 17:23, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Naftalig (talk) 10:40, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Naftalig! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 16:33, Sunday, December 16, 2018 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

AfC notification: Draft:Delek Drilling has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Delek Drilling. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 01:22, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Delek Drilling has been accepted

Delek Drilling, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 02:00, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your help and for assessing the article. Naftalig (talk) 15:01, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Thanks for creating Shai Efrati.

User:Doomsdayer520 while examining this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Thank you for this new article. Note that it is currently an "orphan" meaning that no other Wikipedia articles link TO it. This makes the article tough to find for interested readers. For pointers, follows the links in the notice at the top of the article.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 18:00, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Shai Efrati

The article Shai Efrati has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not meet wp:notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Saff V. (talk) 09:48, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, about the proposed deletion, Efrati founded and currently runs one of the two Hyperbaric chamber in Israel, which is among the biggest ones in the world. he runs a vast research in the hyperbaric field as the Institute Director in addition to his role as the Head of Research and Development unit at Yitzhak Shamir Medical Center. His researches, both in hyperbaric and general medicine received significant attention from independent sources. I just added a phrase about his research in the field of fibromyalgia and a source about the significance of the HBOT in Israel and the significance of Sagol Center for Hyperbaric Medicine In hebrew. These are the reasons it meets the criteria of notability. Naftalig (talk) 13:00, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Reference trying

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Reference trying, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Passenger pigeon (talk) 13:44, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Hello Naftalig. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Naftalig. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Naftalig|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Graywalls (talk) 03:02, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

answer to "undisclosed financial"

I appreciate your diligence in upholding Wikipedia's integrity. I just wanted to clear up any confusion about my Wikipedia edits. I don't edit for money, and my contributions are made out of personal interest, not financial gain. In this case of BrightData Draft, I have friends at the company who asked me for help, I tried to transformed a biased Wikipedia page into one that now aligns with Wikipedia's principles of neutrality and objectivity.

Naftalig (talk) 07:14, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bright Data (November 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LittlePuppers was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Press releases and interviews aren't independent and don't contribute to notability; websites that are just directories of basic information about companies are not significant coverage and don't contribute to notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bright Data and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LittlePuppers (talk) 19:59, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Naftalig! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! LittlePuppers (talk) 19:59, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]