Jump to content

User talk:Nabor11

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Apparent conflict of interest

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Rawhide Boys Ranch, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

  1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
  2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
  3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. --Orange Mike | Talk 17:16, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've brought this up here. --Orange Mike | Talk 17:20, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]


I disagree with your broad characterization of the changes that I've made in the article. The changes that I've made are well supported with mainstream press and website references, are written neutrally, and are factual. If there are issues with specific changes, as well as specific perceptions of non-neutrality, then let's discuss. I've been open that I am working with the Ranch, but I also respect the editorial guidelines of Wikipedia. The article as it was written was dominated by one incident in a 45 year history of operating, and the description of that incident in the "Controversy" section was not written in a neutral tone, had facts strung together illogically, and was clearly intended as biased against the Ranch.Nabor11 (talk) 17:46, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]