User talk:Naasking

Welcome!

Hello, Naasking, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! RJFJR 16:33, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012

Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 05:28, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't follow. All of my recent changes were merely typographical fixes, grammatical fixes, or the addition of an adverb or adjective for clarification. These are all pretty minor. Which change was not minor in your opinion? Naasking (talk) 13:15, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Is "space" an adverb? Or, if it is an adjective, where is its governor? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 15:58, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Join-calculus for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Join-calculus is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Join-calculus until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Guy Macon (talk) 23:41, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary reversion

As I described in my edit on Inside Job (2021 TV series), the series only had two parts, NOT two seasons. Even the Netflix page calls them Parts, as I noted in another recent edit. For IMDB to call them "Seasons" is erroneous (often IMDB has faulty information, so it can NEVER be trusted as a reliable source). Please do not engage in edits which cause problems for other readers. --Historyday01 (talk) 16:25, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know how many times I have to say it, the Netflix page for the show literally says 2 seasons right at the top. Just look: https://imgur.com/a/VblkzNd. The difference between "season" and "part" is not well-defined. If Netflix says it's two seasons, then it should be classified as two seasons. Now I'm not going to waste further time on this nonsense. Naasking (talk) 13:51, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]