User talk:Na-195
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Xfansd (talk) 22:30, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
January 2018
[edit]Again, your edits to the Dragonball article are vandalism. Please knock it off. This is the sort of editing that can lead to your being blocked from editing Wikipedia at all. Please be constructive or please be elsewhere. David in DC (talk) 14:38, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Dragon Ball (manga). You need to add a citation for changes of dates, or it would be considered vandalism. Anchorvale T@lk 06:22, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
February 2018
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Dragon Ball has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Dragon Ball was changed by Na-195 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.869393 on 2018-02-02T14:10:53+00:00 .
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:10, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Widr (talk) 14:36, 2 February 2018 (UTC)March 2018
[edit]Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Dragon Ball (manga). Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 19:06, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of Dragon Ball manga volumes, you may be blocked from editing. You've been blocked before for this behaviour. If the dates are genuinely wrong, you need to cite the superior reliable sources that support the altered dates. —C.Fred (talk) 19:12, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
Dragon Ball
[edit]I have actually checked the date it actually came out on June 19 1984 and ended in May 23 1995 for the sale date not the issue date Na-195 (talk) 20:40, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
March 2018
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Widr (talk) 23:02, 10 March 2018 (UTC)- Please take note of what C.Fred wrote above. If you continue making unsourced changes, you may end up getting blocked indefinitely. Widr (talk) 23:09, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
Dragon Ball
[edit]My edit is correct I have checked December 3 1984 is the cover date for the dragon ball manga not when it first premiered and June 5 1995 is the cover date as well for no 25 1995 this is not the day the last issue premiered the truth is I have already checked the date and it says the Dragon ball manga actually began on June 19 1984 the day the first issue of the manga premiered with the December 1984 issue to May 23 1995 with the June 1995 issue. Na-195 (talk) 09:44, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
- Please give a citation. Anchorvale (talk · contribs) 06:50, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
For Proof look at this link: https://comicvine.gamespot.com/weekly-shonen-jump-838-no-51-1984/4000-300054/
- You can add the citation soon. Anchorvale (talk · contribs) 00:00, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
Dragon ball
[edit]So am I allowed to add the date the dragon ball manga really began its run from June 19 1984 to May 23 1995 instead of the cover date which is December 3 1984 to June 5 1995 Na-195 (talk) 18:37, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
March 2018
[edit]Your recent editing history at Dragon Ball (manga) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - lollerwaffle (Talk) 16:28, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
- This is the true date when the dragon ball manga actually came out on June 19, 1984 to May 23, 1995 there is no edit war there this is the actual date it was out December 3, 1984 is just the cover date for the 51st issue Of the first chapter of Dragon ball just look at the cover closely and June 5, 1995 is just the cover date for the 25th issue for the year 1995 the actual in store release was on May 23, 1995 this is the true evidence I have just made.
- If you do not believe me search in google Weekly Shōnen Jump 51 1984 comicvine and look at that website to make you understand. Na-195 (talk) 16:47, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
- If you have a website you can use as a reference, I'd suggest citing the source in your future edits. However since you've had your changes reverted quite a number of times already, I'd still go to the talk page with the links to discuss it first, instead of editing the page further. - lollerwaffle (Talk)
- The Comicvine "source" you linked to above is a wiki that anyone can edit and therefore is not a reliable source per WP:UGC. The source currently used is published by the Agency for Cultural Affairs which is run by the Japanese government, you will not find a more reliable source. Xfansd (talk) 17:01, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
- If you have a website you can use as a reference, I'd suggest citing the source in your future edits. However since you've had your changes reverted quite a number of times already, I'd still go to the talk page with the links to discuss it first, instead of editing the page further. - lollerwaffle (Talk)
Dragon ball
[edit]Try looking at A website called dragon ball fandom wiki 23:18, 19 March 2018 (UTC)