User talk:NThurston

Talk archive 1 Talk archive 2 Talk archive 3

Awards tables

When you get back... I created {{Infobox Awards}} to replace the use of tables for awards. I currently use it in Advancement and recognition in the Boy Scouts of America#Cub Scout advancement and in Distinguished Eagle Scout Award. It works well, but needs a bit of work. I cannot figure out how to implement the valign parameter to vertically align the text and image. I would appreciate any help. If you can think of any other features, go for it. --Gadget850 ( Ed) 18:03, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

NewComer box

Hello, nice boxes ! A request: in the

Please be nice and patient with this New Wikipedian.

can it say "the" instead of "this" so it can be used by newcomers but also as a part of the kindness campaign not only for newcomers self use? Or if you prefer to create a new box for asking others to be nice to newcomers? Jennylen 09:58, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

BYU lead

There is a discussion going on at BYU's page about the lead. Since you took part in the last one, I thought you may want to have a part in this one. Let's work together to knock out a good, solid opening. Thanks, Wrad 03:08, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Userboxes

I noticed you told another guy how to include an image on a userbox. I was wondering if you could tell me how or give me the link to where it says how. Thank you so much for your help.--Dylanbforthree 23:00, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Brigham Young University Wikiproject

This new wikiproject has been proposed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals#Brigham Young University. Please sign up in order to improve the quality of BYU related articles on wikipedia, including BYU-Idaho and BYU-Hawaii. Thanks. Wrad 01:21, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Latter Day Saint military leaders

Hello. I've nominated this category you created for deletion. See the discussion HERE. Rich Uncle Skeleton 10:10, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Latter Day Saint sports figures

Hello. I've nominated this category you created for deletion. See the discussion HERE. Rich Uncle Skeleton 10:11, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Latter Day Saint entertainers

Hello. I've nominated this category you created for deletion. See the discussion HERE. Rich Uncle Skeleton 10:13, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Userboxes

Well thankyou for putting it so bluntly...hmph! But yes, I guess they are. The think is when I created them, they all had images (hapily used elsewhere on wikipedia) that the copyright police decided were not acceptable for use in useboxes and thus deleted all the images. Thus - substandard userboxes. After they all got anihilated by the deletionists I gave up on bothering to make any more. If you can fix them it would be great. Also would appreciate your advice on how to fix the sports ones. If you look at my user page there are a whole bunch of clubs that I support and I tried to change them to have club logos, but once again the deletionists relaced the images with stupid three letter codes instead of the colourful logos that were there before. Rac fleming (talk) 11:44, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:BSAEagleBadges

Template:BSAEagleBadges has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Gadget850 (Ed) ^talk - 04:02, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Pulpandpaper.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Pulpandpaper.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:35, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:EagleScout.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:EagleScout.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:56, 12 March 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 01:56, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

BYU Template

Hi NThurston. I understand that you're really good with conditional templates and ParserFunctions, so I'm hoping you can help. The BYU Userbox Template already has a switch to change the type of image used, which is nice, but I would also like to add a way to distinguish between current students, alumni, and fans (similar to UT Austin's and Missouri's). I tried some changes myself to no avail. Can you help? --Eustress (talk) 18:13, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Utah Wikipedia Meetup

Interested in attending a Utah Wikipedia Meetup?
If you are interested in a Utah meetup, please visit Wikipedia talk:Meetup/Utah and voice your interest. Not in the Utah area? Check out other meetups around the world!

--Admrb♉ltz (talk) 22:19, 15 September 2008 (UTC) via AWB[reply]

Image copyright problem

Thanks for your uploads. You've indicated that the following images are being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why they meet Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page an image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --03:26, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem

Thanks for your uploads. You've indicated that the following images are being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why they meet Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page an image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --03:54, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem

Thanks for your uploads. You've indicated that the following images are being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why they meet Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page an image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --06:18, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Mb091c.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Mb091c.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:26, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Mb116c.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Mb116c.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:26, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Mb052c.gif

An image you upoladed, Image:Mb052c.gif, is not displaying correctly. -- Suntag ☼ 12:38, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also see Image:Mb054c.gif, Image:Mb055c.gif, Image:Mb071c.gif, Image:Mb074c.gif, Image:Mb076c.gif, Image:Mb077c.gif, Image:Mb078c.gif, Image:Mb079c.gif. -- Suntag ☼ 12:39, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NThurston has not edited in over a year. The images in question were removed from an article due to use problems and are now non-free orphaned. There have been issue lately with the image server, but we can let these go. --—— Gadget850 (Ed) ^talk - 12:58, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Hunting Lodge

An article that you have been involved in editing, Hunting Lodge, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hunting Lodge. Thank you. Cyfal (talk) 12:57, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You maybe interested in the Article Rescue Squadron

Hello, NThurston. Based on the templates on your talk page, please consider joining the Article Rescue Squadron. Rescue Squadron members are focused on rescuing articles for deletion, that might otherwise be lost forever. I think you will find our project matches your vision of Wikipedia. You can join >> here <<.

Ikip (talk) 18:44, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You LDS? I am former LDS myself. 2 year mission to Arizona Ikip (talk) 18:44, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

College Userbox

Howdy! I just created a userbox for my university and I cannot tell you how helpful your advice on Wikipedia_talk:Userboxes/Education/United_States was. I just wanted to drop you a line and thank you for your assistance (even if you didn't know you were helping me). Thanks again! Vdrj2 (talk) 16:00, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pulp and Paper merit badge for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pulp and Paper merit badge is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pulp and Paper merit badge until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Anthem 11:56, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:BlockLetterP.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:40, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Gold Eagle17x15.png

A tag has been placed on File:Gold Eagle17x15.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 17:22, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Current BSA.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Current BSA.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 02:01, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Current BSA.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Current BSA.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 04:46, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:UserboxScale.jpg

The file File:UserboxScale.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, superseded by File:UserboxScale.svg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 08:12, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Philmont camps

Next time you're online, please take a look at this discussion: Talk:Philmont_Scout_Ranch#Major_changes_made. Thanks. --evrik ^(talk) 17:21, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Wikipedians by alma mater: Canisius College

A tag has been placed on Category:Wikipedians by alma mater: Canisius College indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:10, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]