User talk:NCravillion
Blocked as a sockpuppet
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 19:41, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
NCravillion (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am new to Wikipedia and have only made contributions to the Andre Jacque page. My last contribution made was over a month ago. No other person has had access to my wiki account. I am not sure how my account has been viewed as a sockpuppet of Morganoflahrity and then subsequently indefinitely blocked from using my account. I know that all of my contributions are my own work and therefore this block is not an appropriate use of others powers. Especially when I have not even been using my account as of recent. I ask that my account be reinstated and that for accounts to be blocked that a thorough investigation is made. NCravillion (talk) 20:04, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
There was an investigation, at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Morganoflahrity. There seems to be an organized effort to make certain edits about Wisconsin Republican state legislators and those doing it seem to be using many accounts to evade scrutiny. If you aren't doing that, you will need to go into detail about how you came to make these edits and any conflict of interest you might have. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 20:29, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
NCravillion (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
As mentioned, my contributions speak for themselves. I took an interest in politics, studying it in college, and thought I could help contribute to my local state senators Wikipedia page. As I'm just starting out, it is a lot more difficult and time consuming than I thought it would be, so I made just a few minor edits in the past months and left it at that. Most of these minor edits are simply updating the information to include a new updated picture, a few recent awards, recent legislation, and some online articles related to his work. All of my edits have sources to back it up. None of my contributions have any sort of bias, so please explain to me how I violated any sort of Wikipedia policy? I'm clearly being blocked out of political spite and not because I did anything wrong. If you disagree, then I at least deserve an explanation on what contribution was found to be against policy. Again, I have only made a few minor edits and of those they have all been for the same page because I am new and not a single contribution goes against Wikipedia rules or guidelines. 99.27.59.104 (talk) 16:19, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
"I didn't hear that" is a terrible strategy for getting unblocked. 331dot explained exactly why you were blocked, I can read it and so can you, and you went right ahead with a second request that completely ignored the SPI he pointed out in response. If you insist on doing this in a third request, I very strongly recommend the declining admin revoke your access to this page. — Daniel Case (talk) 04:42, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.