User talk:N1gh7r4v3n

Recent edits to Mahikari

Hello, and thank you for your recent contributions. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edits because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! - Cwobeel (talk) 23:17, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to Mahikari

I dont think so. Mahikari is a cult. I know as i grew up with it. So! And also check http://www.culthelp.info/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=834&Itemid=11 - So you see this is a cult! So stop writing about them as if they are harmless. They are very dangerous! - N1gh7r4v3n (talk) 20:45, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

wikipedia guidelines

Would you please get familiar with Wikipedia guidelines? No disrespect in terms of personal experiences I have similar ones in a different group. In the long run you will be able to improve respective articles!!! --Catflap08 (talk) 21:07, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Would you please respect reality

This is a cult and also listed here for example https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Governmental_lists_of_cults_and_sects N1gh7r4v3n (talk) 21:15, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

sorry

This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Let me be brutally honest here. I saw the discussion at AN and I have to say that it very, very much looks to me like you are in very much in over your head. You might be interested in looking at WP:ADOPT as well. We do use the word "cult" rather frequently around here, because it is an emotionally-loaded word with extreme negative connotations which many people love using against groups they don't like. But it is not in any way a particularly good description of any group, because the emotionalism overwhelms any useful data which the word might convey, and, unfortunately, the definition of the word, or lack of same, is such that it really isn't that useful to us here, except in matters of addressing the accusation. I really think it would be in your interests to become a bit more familiar with our policies and guidelines before starting threads like the one you recently started at AN again. John Carter (talk) 21:58, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well i now for sure that its a real and dangerous cult organisation. No discussion possible. Thats not an opinion but a fact that is well known. As you can see its listed as a cult even on wikipedia. https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Governmental_lists_of_cults_and_sects

Besides that i know them in person. Do you? Do you know how much money my mom gives to them? Do you know what kind of sick racist ideas they spread? No you dont know all of that! Because only people that live in the real world and have met these people know that for sure.

But if you prefer to continue to live in your virtual world. Go on doing that. But i think the truth should be out there. Also on WIKIPEDIA. Thats why i changed the text. But appearantly you guys just dont care how many people are victimized by them. You really should have a look here: http://www.mahikariexposed.com/. If we cant use the word cult? How do we warn people about these guys? YOu really should read this http://www.oocities.org/emperorsmen/ and this http://www.mahikariexposed.com/ and the article need to be more accurate and have some kind of warning. N1gh7r4v3n (talk) 01:33, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I know the policies and guidelines of wikipedia, which determine what we say and how we act here, which you apparently do not. We are based on independent reliable sources, and, ultimately, I regret to say, you are not an independent reliable source. Please read WP:TRUTH, WP:NPOV in addition to our other policies and guidelines. Once again, I urge you very strongly to familiarize yourself with all of our policies and guidelines before attempting any further edits which might violate them in the future. Also, feel free to contact others at the Wikipedia:Teahouse if you want any active help in perhaps making potentially disruptive changes to our content again. John Carter (talk) 01:43, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

N1gh7r4v3n, No one's trying to stop you from calling a cult a cult, however, you need to have a reliable reference to support your idea that this is a cult, you can't use Wikipedia as a a reference for itself, however, that article that you referenced in the message above, look at it and see what reference(s) are being used to call this organization a cult. Only with reliable references can this be included. KoshVorlon Je Suis Charlie 12:21, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]