User talk:Mzimmerman

Welcome!

Hello, Mzimmerman, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like DEGW, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! RadioFan (talk) 16:58, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of DEGW

A tag has been placed on DEGW requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. RadioFan (talk) 16:58, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Frank Duffy 01.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Frank Duffy 01.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Polly (Parrot) 19:33, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of John Worthington (architect)

A tag has been placed on John Worthington (architect) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Little Professor (talk) 01:40, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Advice

Hi Mzimmerman, I saw your draft article and would like to help you out with making it suitable for moving to mainspace. I'm afraid that there are a lot of problems with the current version, and if it were moved now it would be deleted quickly again as reading too much like an advert. Based on the results of this google news search the company is notable enough to be included in the encyclopedia per WP:CORP as it has received coverage in multiple reliable sources. The most important thing about writing an article is that it is based on sources such as those listed on google news, so that the information is verifiable, rather than being based on what you know personally. The links I've given are to our policies and guidelines which should help you to work out what is ok, and what is not ok, to include. I notice that you've mentioned several publications by DEGW, these should probably only be mentioned in the article if other sources have mentioned them as being important, including them otherwise might look overly promotional. Secondly, the article must be written from a neutral point of view so stuff like "helps clients articulate their requirements in ways that stimulate the delivery of imaginative, innovative and workable solutions designed to improve performance through stimulating a more dynamic relationship between people and place" simply isn't suitable for an article. I'd suggest maybe working from scratch again (it's a shame you didn't ask for advice before) using sources from google news and google books. I'd be happy to look over anything you write using these sources, and provide further tips if you wish.

Finally, this would suggest you may have a conflict of interest, but this shouldn't prevent you from writing a good article, but you'll have to be extra careful to stick to what reliable sources say and to maintain a neutral point of view.

Good luck! SmartSE (talk) 17:22, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Frank Duffy 01.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Frank Duffy 01.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Redsky89 (talk) 15:23, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]