User talk:Myyyyy

October 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Veal, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Veal was changed by Myyyyy (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.942423 on 2011-10-14T18:32:04+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:32, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Veal. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. DVdm (talk) 18:51, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other contributors, as you did with this edit to Talk:Veal. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 19:04, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Look Jeff, you do not understand, but the laws of nature are very stringent. I was only trying to warn him. He says "why crackpots should hate veal production". Isn't that attacking others? You too try to understand. Have you ever seen a cow or a calf writhe in agonizing pain while being slaughtered? You like that?Myyyyy (talk) 19:19, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to M. Karunanidhi, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. --some jerk on the Internet (talk) 19:16, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at M. K. Kanimozhi. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The reverted edit can be found here. --some jerk on the Internet (talk) 19:17, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Are you an Indian? What do you know about Indian politicians? -Myyyyy (talk) 19:20, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. DMacks (talk) 19:45, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Camlin logo2 monoc.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Camlin logo2 monoc.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]