Jump to content

User talk:Mywiki2664

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Mywiki2664, you are invited to the Teahouse

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Mywiki2664! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Doctree (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:17, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Brigid Harrington, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Prabash.Akmeemana 15:37, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

advice

[edit]

As reviewing administrator, I've been wondering a little at your article, which seems to contain a good deal of duplication, the sort of duplication that we sometimes think promotional. The style doesn't match our usual style either; we're an encyclopedia and we try for a somewhat regular look. We aim at readability, not eye-catching design, and use text variations only to a limited extent. You seem to have written the article in html, not wikitext--that is OK, for our system does handle most html codes, and the ones you used are easily converted. We don't indent paragraphs.. The picture at the top should instead be used in WP:INFOBOX -- see other pages for entertainers and copy the format. But the main reason I'm writing is because I'm fixing the page, and I want to make sure you realize it would not be a good idea to restore your unique format. . and, btw, make certain that nothing there is a copy or Close paraphrase of material published elsewhere. If there is, rewrite that part from scratch, changing not just the words, but the arrangement into sentences and the sequence of ideas. DGG ( talk ) 04:01, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Mywiki2664. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Mywiki2664. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Zackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions to Brigid Harrington. I noticed that when you added the image to the infobox, you added it as a thumbnail. In the future, please do not use thumbnails when adding images to an infobox (see WP:INFOBOXIMAGE). What does this mean? Well in the infobox, when you specify the image you wish to use, instead of doing it like this:

|image=[[File:SomeImage.jpg|thumb|Some image caption]]

Instead just supply the name of the image. So in this case you can simply do:

|image=SomeImage.jpg.

There will then be a separate parameter for the image caption such as |caption=Some image caption. Please note that this is a generic form message I am leaving on your page because you recently added a thumbnail to an infobox. The specific parameters for the image and caption may be different for the infobox you are using! Please consult the Template page for the infobox being used to see better documentation. Thanks! Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 20:21, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Mywiki2664. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Mywiki2664. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Shannon Harrington, and Brigid Harrington you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.


Hello,

I have no external relationship with this page or any page I helped work on. I wanted to try my hand at Wikipedia. I worked hard on this to be accurate and thorough and I have not done many because it is a lot of work. The actor is well established over many years and known throughout the region and country. I believe the page has strong merit which is why I spent time on it. I took a great deal of time researching all the sourcing and I think my work was very beneficial to the entire Wikipedia community. If there are issues on formatting I would hope someone else would make those corrections. But the information is completely valid and merits publication. Thanks.

Mywiki2664 talk 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Mywiki2664 Since your only contributions are related to Brigid Harrington and her sister Shannon Harrington, your claim of no connection stretches credulity. It is better to cop to it. If you are directly connected to or paid by the subjects, that doesn't mean that their articles automatically have to come down. But declaring any conflicts of interest is imperative. Wikipedia has ways such as WP:AFC available to folks connected with the subject. — Ad Meliora TalkContribs 20:21, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Hello Ad Meliora and thank you for your comment. I simply created a Wikipedia page years ago and in learning about that subject I discovered enough sourcing, notability and verifiability to create another related page. I would like to do more and may decide to do so in the future. This is not something I do for profit of any kind and I think the work is transparent and speaks for itself. Thanks again!--Mywiki2664 (talk) 20:43, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Hello @Mywiki2664: Are you are a family member? The reason for this question is that the photographs on both of the sisters articles, were apparently shot by you, and uploaded as your "own work". Please explain. Thank you. Netherzone (talk) 21:21, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Hello Netherzone. I do own those photographs as I am a professional photographer. Thanks --Mywiki2664 (talk) 21:36, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

@Mywiki2664: Were you hired to take them? Netherzone (talk) 21:39, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again Netherzone. It was pro bono. Thanks.--Mywiki2664 (talk) 21:40, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Shannon Harrington for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shannon Harrington, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shannon Harrington until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

IMDB

[edit]

Hi. IMDB is not a WP:RS. If you want to save the Harrington articles, I strongly recommend that you replace the IMDB refs with sources from news reviews of her performances or other acceptable sources. I'm trying to help you. -- Ssilvers (talk) 06:02, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ssilvers and thank you very much -- I really appreciate your help. I will go in and do that now. --Mywiki2664 (talk) 06:01, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:34, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]