User talk:Mytanveer

Automatic invitation to visit WP:Teahouse sent by HostBot

Hi Mytanveer! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! TheOriginalSoni (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:41, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tanveer Alam

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tanveer Alam requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. reddogsix (talk) 05:11, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Tanveer Alam. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. reddogsix (talk) 10:56, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tanveer Alam

The article Tanveer Alam has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article. The nominator also raised the following concern:

All biographies of living people created after March 18, 2010, must have references.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Stephen! ^Coming... 17:10, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tanveer Alam for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tanveer Alam is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tanveer Alam until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. reddogsix (talk) 16:34, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Maru Dhar Mharo Ghar

The article Maru Dhar Mharo Ghar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable film/show lacking content and references of substance.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. reddogsix (talk) 17:28, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tanveer Alam

Hi Mytanveer, regarding the article linked above the article was previously deleted in accordance with an articles for deletion discussion which means that if you want to recreate it you need to either talk to the admin who deleted the article (here) or, if you believe the admin was incorrect in the closure, ask for a review at Wikipedia:Deletion review. If you have any question please feel free to ask. Regards, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 13:42, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Mytanveer. You have new messages at Callanecc's talk page.
Message added 13:56, 1 December 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 13:56, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mytanveer/sandbox (December 1)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at User:Mytanveer/sandbox.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Rankersbo (talk) 22:56, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Maru Dhar Mharo Ghar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Maru Dhar Mharo Ghar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maru Dhar Mharo Ghar until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. reddogsix (talk) 04:11, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Alam Tanveer Alam

Hello Mytanveer,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Alam Tanveer Alam for deletion, because it seems to be an article that was previously deleted by a consensus decision.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Ish dar ian 05:47, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alam Tanveer

The article Alam Tanveer has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. VQuakr (talk) 09:02, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will be removed shortly (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. VQuakr (talk) 09:06, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked from editing

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for continuing to recreate material after being told how to contest the deletion which has been deleted via a deletion discussion using a number of page titles to try and avoid scrutiny (eg 1, 2, & 3). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:26, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Before you begin editing again it is important that you understand some of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines which are especially relevant to you:

Firstly if you have previously editing using another account (User:Tanveer Alam) it is important to state this on your user page so that you aren't accused of sockpuppetry.
It seems you are writing about yourself. This is a common mistake made by new Wikipedians—as this is an encyclopedia, we wouldn't expect to have an article about every contributor.
Because of this you are participating in an area in which you have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are the subject of that article. To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone or deleted, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or any other editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. The plain and simple conflict of interest guide may also be helpful reading.
In general you should not edit in areas in which you are personally involved because you will be unable to stay neutral and present a well-rounded article which complies with all of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you choose not to take this advice it is likely that next time you will be blocked from editing for an extended period of time, so I ask you to please consider the advice above. Thanks, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:35, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mytanveer (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

one of my friend used my PC. after that there is no multiple use of my PC, so please allow me now to edit pages. one of my friend used my PC and created his account with the name of News and Views Media. because of multiple used of same IP, wiki blocked my id. please review it News Views Media 12:35 pm, Today (UTC+0)

Decline reason:

Please do not file more than one unblock request at a time. Your "friend" made identical edits to you in order to try and force an article on Tanveer Alam into the encyclopedia, so either you are lying, or you are colluding off-wiki. Either way, you are in violation of the policy on multiple accounts and will remain blocked. Yunshui 雲‍水 12:48, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mytanveer (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i am not lying, and there is no reason of lying. he used my PC for some work on wiki as well other website. what he did, i dont know. if you feel i am not able to unblock than means i am not fulfilling the unblock requirements. kindly review my account again and see i ad more and more useful information into wiki and i want continue to do the same. regards

Decline reason:

Too much like WP:BROTHER - Short block, just wait until it ends. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 17:06, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mytanveer (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

is there any hope to unblock me ??

Decline reason:

Based on the evidence of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Tanveer_Alam/Archive, definitely not. only (talk) 16:09, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Speedy deletion nomination of IFTDA

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on IFTDA requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Mdann52 (talk) 08:42, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]