User talk:Mypurplelightsaber

Mypurplelightsaber, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Mypurplelightsaber! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

22:03, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Mypurplelightsaber, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page Parvati Shallow, have removed content without an explanation. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can place {{helpme}} on your talk page along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page and how to develop articles
Help pages
Tutorial
Article wizard for creating new articles
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! NitinMlk (talk) 21:49, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

Hello, I'm Emir of Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently removed content from Sibling without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 22:14, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Darren Criss, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hedwig and the Angry Inch (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Mypurplelightsaber. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018 U.S. Classic, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mountain House, California (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Mypurplelightsaber. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Footer European Artistic Gymnastics Team Champions (Women)/Year listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Footer European Artistic Gymnastics Team Champions (Women)/Year. Since you had some involvement with the Footer European Artistic Gymnastics Team Champions (Women)/Year redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Stefan2 (talk) 21:44, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NavigationYouthOlympicsArtisticGymnasticsGirlsVault listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect NavigationYouthOlympicsArtisticGymnasticsGirlsVault. Since you had some involvement with the NavigationYouthOlympicsArtisticGymnasticsGirlsVault redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Stefan2 (talk) 21:54, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited NCAA Women's Gymnastics Championships, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ashley Kelly (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hello, I am a fellow contributor in articles about gymnastics. Thank you for your recent edits. It is great to have someone else dedicated to help expanding content related to gymnastics on Wikipedia. -- ThiagoSimoes (talk) 00:34, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thais Fidelis

Hello again. I see you have updated the bio for Thais Fidelis with the medal she earned at the FIG All-Around World Cup series on the medal record. The problem here is that according to a previous discussion on the Talk Page of Project Gymnastics, active members of the project decided that medals earned at the World Cup series would not be added to the medal record. You can inform her competitive record on the page, but the medal record is restricted to international medals in events that happen only once a year, not events that are part of a world series or divided in several stages. I understand your reasoning, though. In order to try to circumvent this limitation, I added the number of medals she earned at the World Cup series to the medal record. I also started a new discussion about it on the Talk Page of Project Gymnastics. I would appreciate if you could take your time and also contribute to the discussion. -- ThiagoSimoes (talk) 22:50, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2019 L'International Gymnix

The article 2019 L'International Gymnix has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable sports event.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 00:11, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lwymmd listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Lwymmd. Since you had some involvement with the Lwymmd redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. N Ø 21:49, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited FIG Artistic Gymnastics World Cup series – 2020 Summer Olympics Qualification, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andrey Medvedev (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:21, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Melanie de Jesus dos Santos

Please stop editing the links to the article about Melanie de Jesus dos Santos so her full name can be displayed. This makes absolutely no difference to the articles other than make the tables look ugly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.135.161.1 (talk) 15:21, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@200.135.161.1: I'm sorry you find Mélanie de Jesus dos Santos' name too long and think it makes tables "look ugly", but that is her name (as used on social media and on her FIG license), so I don't think tables looking ugly is a good enough reason not to use her given name.

I agree with the unsigned comment. It might be her given name in FIG competitions, but FIG also credits Bruna Leal as KUROIWA YAMAMOTO LEAL Bruna (link to her profile) and I've never seen it being credited anywhere like this. Also, Milka Gehani is credited as ELPITIYA BADALGE DONA Milka Gehani (link to her profile) and it would be unpractical to credit her name like this anywhere. As a final note, whenever Mélanie dos Santos' name is mentioned, there is a link to her article where her full name can be seen and is displayed, so no harm is caused to the gymnast and it's impossible for anyone to confuse her name for any other gymnast. Common sense goes a long way here. -- ThiagoSimoes (talk) 16:06, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@ThiagoSimoes: Another reason in favor of using "De Jesus Dos Santos" in full is because that is how it is used in media as well. When being referred to by only last name, she is never referred to by "Dos Santos"; it is always the full "De Jesus Dos Santos". (Olympic Channel, FIG Website, French Language Source, Intl Gymnast magazine). So in short, she never seems to be referred to as just "Mélanie dos Santos" so I don't see why she should be referred to as such on the FIG World Cup pages. -- Mypurplelightsaber 16:57, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tom Holland (actor). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges.

Please refrain from adding "rowspans" to filmography tables per WP:FILMOGRAPHY'' LADY LOTUS • TALK 15:41, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited United States women's national gymnastics team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mountain House, California (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:29, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

About 2020 L'International Gymnix in particular and Gymnix in general

Hi Mypurplelightsaber.

@Mypurplelightsaber and Catyneill:

I noticed that Catyneill recently created the the 2020 L'International Gymnix article.

My first thought was to add a link to Gymnix article and to the L'International Gymnix series of events. As an administrator on the English language Wikipedia, I can see that "Gymnix" and "L'International Gymnix" articles have never been created.

It would appear to me that the Gymnix series does not pass the WP:EVENT test for notability and as an organization does not pass the WP:CORPDEPTH test.

What do you think about this?

Please let me know if I can help you in any way about the English language Wikipedia.

Pete AU aka --Shirt58 (talk) 10:24, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please remember to add the colend template at the end of a column-formatted list

Thanks for your edits to templates to make them more readable on different-sized screens. Very helpful. Please remember to use Template:colend at the end of a column-formatted list. Thanks! – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:12, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to The Bachelorette (season 16), it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. It is only pure speculations right now. ABC and/or The Bachelor franchise have yet to confirm. — YoungForever^(talk) 01:41, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Leo Dottavio

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Leo Dottavio, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Praxidicae (talk) 15:39, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:49, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging pages for deletion

Hello, Mypurplelightsaber,

First, thank you for your work. When you tag pages for deletion (CSD, PROD, AFD/TFD/CFD/etc.), please note this in the edit summary you leave. Also, you must notify the page creator with a notice to their talk page. If you make use of Twinkle, the program will "Notify page creator" once you set up your Preferences which makes the process easy so I encourage you to utilize it. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:41, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2018-2021 Apparatus World Cup Rankings

Hello, Mypurplelightsaber,

About this Wikipedia page: FIG_Artistic_Gymnastics_World_Cup_series_–_2020_Summer_Olympics_Qualification Are you sure that the points for the world cup are re-distributed for the purpose of the last quota place? I couldn't find any official source for that. Wouldn't they simply use these rankings: https://www.gymnastics.sport/site/rankings/ranking_mag.php

Thanks for your answer, SimTheWorld (talk) 22:04, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021 in artistic gymnastics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andrey Medvedev.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited United States men's national gymnastics team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scott Johnson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of All Around (web series) for deletion

A discussion is taking place to determine if the article All Around (web series) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/All Around (web series) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

JBchrch talk 14:34, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Help needed in gymnastics articles

Since I know you're very knowledgeable both about wikipedia and gymnastics, I could use your help, please. I've recently discovered an enormous amount of stubs created about Olympic gymnasts that incorrectly credit them with competing in multiple events when they hadn't made it past qualifications. I've been going through the gymnasts listed in the qualifications page, starting with the 2004 games. Can you help me fix these, please? It could be hundreds of articles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Afheather (talk • contribs) 21:37, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Footer Olympic Champions - Figure Skating - Team/Year

Template:Footer Olympic Champions - Figure Skating - Team/Year has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 08:55, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2021 in artistic gymnastics best scores

Hello, I understand your concern about my inclusion of domestic tournaments in Japan, China & Russia in the season's best scores. However, since these are very dominant countries with many strong competitors, many of them don't have chance to perform in international stage, therefore such comparison would be much less comprehensive and fair. I asked people working or competing in gymnastics in Japan & China and they said that their scoring systems are the same as the FIG. And if you compare the results of specific gymnasts like Daiki Hashimoto or Zhang Boheng, you would see that their domestic and international results in each apparatus are in stable ranges (if they don't make any big mistakes of course). It also should be noticed that both of them could have their best results in international stage: for Hashimoto, he achieved 88.465 at Olympic AA Final despite making mistakes in rings and vault, which costed him about 0.500-0.600 in total, or that he got 87.964 despite a fall in PH, which led to the result 0.800-1.000 lower than his usual; for Zhang, his also fell in PH at World Championships AA Final, for which he received the score about 1.000-1.200 lower than his usual, but still achieved 87.981. That being said, with their usual good routines, those two could have reached about 89.000 in total in international stage, higher than 88.565 for Zhang and 88.532 for Hashimoto in domestic competitions. Therefore, there should be no worry about Japanese and Chinese gymnasts being overscored. In other countries, however, like the US, Turkey, Ukraine...domestic results were weirdly much higher for all gymnasts, therefore I did't included those in the list, but created a "special mentions" category in 2021 Top Scorers in Men's Artistic Gymnastics. So I hope you won't make any edit to the list of men's best scores in 2021 in artistic gymnastics that would exclude domestic results in Japan, China and Russia (although I'm rethinking about the last one). It's for fairer and more comprehensive comparision.

Thank you very much!

Have a nice day! — Preceding unsigned comment added by NguyenDuyAnh1995 (talk • contribs) 21:13, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I understand your concern and know that while Japanese and Chinese athlete will top the lists whether we include only international or all competitions, we really only should include international competitions. Same goes for Women's Artistic Gymnastics (not including US, Russian, or Chinese domestic meets even if they are closer to "FIG" scoring than say the Romanians). It's a shame that some talented gymnasts in both MAG and WAG do not get to go to international competitions due to the depth of their national teams and therefore won't always be represented on these "top international scores" lists, but it seems to be counterproductive and not very fair to only include domestic competitions from some countries but not others. Mypurplelightsaber (talk) 23:03, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but I have to disagree with you. The purpose of this ranking is not only for comparison, but also to show which gymnasts are the leading ones. Excluding some of the top results will not make it fairer, but hinder many strong competitors' to be known. Unfortunately the scoring systems in many countries like US, Turkey, Ukraine are not close to FIG's, but it's not necessary to ignore those in Japan and China. Also, this list honours gymnasts with their best abilities, hence the more results the more accurate people can judge them. If you look at the WAG's, most of the results are from the Olympics and World Championships, whereas this is the sport with very high risk of mistakes and falls. NguyenDuyAnh1995 (talk) 00:47, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As for WAG, that list only includes international competitions. If we include domestic meets then for the top 20 AA scores in 2021 only Angelina Melnikova and Jade Carey would have international scores on the list with the rest getting their best score domestically. If we include one country’s domestic meets, we might as well include all domestic meets to honor those gymnasts as well.

Picking and choosing only some countries domestic events starts to get problematic. Country A & B score fairly so we should include them. Country C is sometimes fair so we should only include some of their domestic competitions. Country D is usually bad but athlete 1 gets scored fairly so we should include his domestic scores. But never include Country E’s domestic meets because they are inflated. See how convoluted that can get? It’s best to stick with just international scores and not get into the nitty gritty of possible domestic overscoring. If we just include Japan and China, we might be leaving out scores from other countries meets for routines that were FIG aligned even if the whole meet wasn’t. Mypurplelightsaber (talk) 17:18, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @NguyenDuyAnh1995: Why can only Japanese and Chinese domestic meets be taken into consideration? Why can't an Italian World Champion's domestic scores be taken into consideration when his domestic score was close to his score received at the FIG World Championships? It's one thing to want to honor Japanese and Chinese gymnasts who don't get the international experience they deserve due to the depth of their national teams. It's another to ignore non-Japanese/Chinese gymnasts who deserve the high scores they get both domestically and internationally. Please don't cherry pick domestic scores and please do show the same consideration for non-Japanese/Chinese gymnasts that you show for those J/C gymnasts with no international experience in 2021. Japan and China may have the most talented male gymnasts, but they aren't the only countries with talented MAG athletes. Mypurplelightsaber (talk) 00:57, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good evening! First of all I have to say that I didn't ignore gymnasts who don't come from Japan and China, because as you can see in 2021 Top Scorers in Men's Artistic Gymnastics, I also have some categories called "Special mention". Gymnasts in these are those with scores which are high enough to be in the main list, but it's also difficult to determine whether or not they were overscored. I include results from domestic tournaments in Japan and China in the main list because through several analysis and also asking some friends working for or associating with gymnastics in the 2 countries, I have concluded that almost all of the results are close to international standard or lower. For those in special mention categories, I will need time to analyze to decide whether or not to include them in the main list.

As you are asking about the result of Nicola Bartolini, it's true that his 15.100 at Italian Series A Final Six is close to his 14.966 at the World Championships. However, the later took place in late October, while the former was in mid May, more than 5 months is enough for improvement. If you take a look at his results surrounding the Final Six, you can see that in the very close period, the 15.100 is weirdly higher than all others. The international competition he participated then was the European Championships in late April, and his FX scores were stable, namely 14.500, 14.666 & 14.558, and has high accuracy of his ability at that period. Therefore, it's difficult to believe that 15.100 wasn't an overscored results, which would mean Bartolini only need half a month to jump from mid-14 to 15.100 in May, and bounced back to mid-14 in July.

Now, for the FX results in Japan, one of the countries included in the main list, I can take the example of Kazuki Minami. Unfortunately in 2021 the only international competition he participated in was the World Championships, at which he didn't perform well and hinted the disappointment on Instagram. Therefore it's hard to make comparison as for Bartolini above. However, it should be noticed that he scored 15.100 in 2019, at the Cottbus World Cup and Paris Challenge Cup, so it's not surprised if he could achieve 15.433, 15.300, 15.200, 15.166 2 years later as he was very young. Also, let's compare all of his FX results in 2019: 26-28/4: 14.633 - 14.800, 18-19/5: 14.800, 21-23/6: 15.033 - 14.800, 20-22/8: 14.900, 14-15/9: 15.100 - 15.050, 21-24/11: 15.100 - 14.866. See how consistent the FIG and Japanese judges graded him in 2019? That's one of many many examples that make me decide to include results from Japanese and Chinese domestic competitions (only national level) in the main lists.

Don't worry, I'll take a look at every national championships and put the scores that are high enough in the special mention categories, and then analyze to see if they can be on the main lists. Yahor Sharamkou might be able on the floor, but Nicola Bartolini is highly not.

18:35, 16 April 2022 (UTC) NguyenDuyAnh1995 (talk) 18:35, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As for WAG, that list only includes international competitions. If we include domestic meets then for the top 20 AA scores in 2021 only Angelina Melnikova and Jade Carey would have international scores on the list with the rest getting their best score domestically. If we include one country’s domestic meets, we might as well include all domestic meets to honor those gymnasts as well.

Picking and choosing only some countries domestic events starts to get problematic. Country A & B score fairly so we should include them. Country C is sometimes fair so we should only include some of their domestic competitions. Country D is usually bad but athlete 1 gets scored fairly so we should include his domestic scores. But never include Country E’s domestic meets because they are inflated. See how convoluted that can get? It’s best to stick with just international scores and not get into the nitty gritty of possible domestic overscoring. If we just include Japan and China, we might be leaving out scores from other countries meets for routines that were FIG aligned even if the whole meet wasn’t. Mypurplelightsaber (talk) 01:28, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2019 in artistic gymnastics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page İbrahim Çolak.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Mypurplelightsaber

Thank you for creating Lexi Zeiss.

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 04:08, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

gymnastics

Hello! I saw you have been creating new gymnast pages! I have been adding competition history to existing pages but I decided to clean up the gymnastics project page and along with that I updated the requested gymnast articles Wikipedia:Requested articles/Sports#Gymnastics to include what I think is a bit more than 70 gymnasts. I'm not saying this to tell you to do anything but I honestly have no idea how many active wikipedia editors there are and if they check the project page since I found it to be a bit disorganized so I wanted to let you know that there is an opportunity to create more pages if you wish and that you don't need to search for gymnasts that apply to the notability guidelines for a while if you plan on making more pages :)

P.S. I don't believe these are all the remaining gymnasts that abide by the notability guidelines, but I found a lot of the ones that automatically apply based on the gymnastics specific criteria. Only WAG though. Hope to talk more soon :)

TheWAGymFan (talk) 23:17, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2023 in artistic gymnastics moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 2023 in artistic gymnastics, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:32, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2023 in artistic gymnastics (March 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at 2023 in artistic gymnastics instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. This is sometimes done in order to bypass Articles for Creation review. However, if a submitter is ready to have the article in article space, it can be moved into article space, rather than creating a copy. It is common for a page that has been duplicated in draft space and in article space to be nominated for deletion or proposed for deletion.

If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.

This draft is either essentially the same as the article with the same name, or a subset of the article with the same name. The draft will be replaced by a redirect from draft space to the article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2023 in artistic gymnastics and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 01:31, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2023 City of Jesolo Trophy

The article 2023 City of Jesolo Trophy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails GNG and EVENT. Sources in the article are stats, routine sports news, nothing that meets WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and in-depth.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. // Timothy :: talk 06:57, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:NCAA gymnasts who have scored a perfect 10 has been nominated for deletion

Category:NCAA gymnasts who have scored a perfect 10 has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. User:Namiba 12:19, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2023 DTB Pokal Stuttgart has been accepted

2023 DTB Pokal Stuttgart, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

SportingFlyer T·C 13:32, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:NCAA gymnasts who have scored a perfect 10

A tag has been placed on Category:NCAA gymnasts who have scored a perfect 10 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

CFD agreed to delete, hasn't occurred yet

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. User:Namiba 16:08, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Gymnast infoboxes

First off, thank you for the work that you're doing in the men's artistic gymnastics space. While I haven't encountered yet (I'm starting older to newer, focused right now on athletes 1932 and earlier), I noticed a recent edit you've made to Riley Loos. I saw that his infobox had the Stanford Cardinal logo with NCAA achievements. I have been working off of Simone Biles as a rough template for older men's Olympic athletes (who don't have other moving parts/competitions yet) so haven't run across anything other than the Olympic rings, which I've included. Is there any precedent or pre-existing consensus for this inclusion? Additionally, for medals earned in other competitions, are those logos included as well (e.g. Pan Am Games, USAG national championships, AAU, of course college/NCAA, etc.)? Any ideas? GauchoDude (talk) 17:15, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I believe for the MedalCompetition part of the medaltemplate field, only the Olympic rings are used. I once attempted to add the FIG logo for World Championships but that was quickly reverted due to some sort of Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria violation. And I believe we started using the NCAA team logos for the MedalCountry field due to there not being a "flag" (like you see when the MedalCountry field is the country). Mypurplelightsaber (talk) 17:33, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. So moving (slowly) forward, once I get to the relevant NCAA information, it's consensus that we add the collegiate logo if/when applicable, and we have the Olympic logo for those who have participated and won a medal, but there are no other considerations made for Pan Am Games, Pan Am Championships, AAU Championships, Worlds, literally any other competition, etc., yes? Just want to make sure once I get there that I'm making everything according to consensus vs. getting so far down the road and then having to backtrack later on, haha. GauchoDude (talk) 18:59, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welp, as I got to the very first person for whom I put NCAA information for, I got this bot removal. How is it present in other gymnasts' infoboxes but I'm unable to mirror? GauchoDude (talk) 13:28, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confusing edit

Why did you do this? https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Simone_Biles&diff=1189430310&oldid=1189289096 ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:57, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The "Jr/Sr" portion of the table does not match the agreed upon table layout defined in WikiProject Gymnastics. Mypurplelightsaber (talk) 14:51, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, then fix that to be something intelligible. Did you read MOS:DTAB, MOS:COLHEAD, MOS:TABLECAPTION, etc.? Local consensus cannot override basic, required accessibility. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 14:52, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Mypurplelightsaber. Thank you for your work on 2024 U.S. Classic. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 11:21, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thefamouspeople as a reference

Hi Mypurplelightsaber. I noticed that you used thefamouspeople.com as a reference in Belarus at the World Artistic Gymnastics Championships. [1] Please note that the general consensus as expressed at WP:RSN is that it does not meet the reliable sourcing criteria for such information. I've gone ahead and removed it. If you disagree, let's discuss it. You may want to check WP:RSP and WP:RSN to help determine if a source is reliable. Thanks.--Hipal (talk) 16:43, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox natlteam

Thanks for your continued work on United States MAG-related articles. Had a question pop up as I think I've viewed an infobox field differently. I noticed you had recently filled out the |natlteam field with more than just the years/dates an individual was on the senior team, most recently with Brett McClure and a few others. The field, as far as I can tell, populates "Years on national team" for the infobox, which would align with dates. However, you've also been adding the team associated alongside the years, which I feel is doubled up in most/all instances via the field |country which outputs "Country represented". Is there any reason as to why we feel the need to have the country outputted multiple times in the same inbox?

I feel like the easy answer here would be years/dates in the |natlteam field (e.g. 1999–2006) and utilize the |country field as team represented (e.g. United States). Thoughts? GauchoDude (talk) 14:02, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Removing dead references

Please don't remove dead links, like you did in Special:Diff/1243784450, without making sure the links are actually unrecoverable. For example, the first link you removed, http://www.gymcan.org/disciplines/womens-artistic-gymnastics/national-teams/ellie-black, is avaliable on the Wayback machine at https://web.archive.org/web/20151105042126/http://www.gymcan.org/disciplines/womens-artistic-gymnastics/national-teams/ellie-black. The second link, http://gymcan.org/news/details/2018_CWG_Announcement_EN, is avaliable at https://web.archive.org/web/20180226200432/http://gymcan.org:80/news/details/2018_CWG_Announcement_EN. I haven't looked at the rest. The bot is not perfect at finding archived versions of the website, so don't remove the references without checking first. — Qwerfjkl talk 12:54, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted your edit in lieu of a response per WP:BRD. — Qwerfjkl talk 17:34, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Survivor (American TV series) contestants

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Category:Survivor (American TV series) contestants requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 5#Category:Survivor (American TV series) contestants. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. George Ho (talk) 03:31, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]