User talk:Mynameisparitoshmandal

Just a Request

Please don't post anything inappropriate here. Mynameisparitoshmandal (talk) 05:41, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Hello, I'm Possibly. I noticed that you recently removed content from the Conflict of Interest Noticeboard . Don't do that again. Thanks. --- Possibly (talk) 06:37, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Annwesha Hazra has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. bonadea contributions talk 12:59, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Bonadea: Who told you that I have copied them from somewhere. Can you prove it? I had used sources from Times of India, and now they are saying the news published in it are fake. [1] Scroll to the bottom and you will find out. And you are asking to use sources from publications. But Times of India is also a publication. Now what to do. Please look into the matter. Thanks Mynameisparitoshmandal (talk) 13:19, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nobody told me. The text in the "Notes" section of the table is exactly identical to text found elsewhere on Wikipedia or on other websites, for instance here and here. Apart from being copyright violations, those text snippets are inappropriate because they are promotionally written. What you need to do, since you have a paid conflict of interest, is avoid editing the article at all (instead use edit requests as described below, in the section "Managing a conflict of interest"); in particular you should not edit war, that is, revert back to your preferred version when multiple editors have reverted your edits. Thank you. --bonadea contributions talk 14:10, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Vexations. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:Possibly that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Vexations (talk) 13:56, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Mynameisparitoshmandal. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. MarioGom (talk) 07:30, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disclosure

This user, in accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, discloses that they have been paid by Shree Venkatesh Films for their contributions to Annwesha Hazra.

Speedy deletion nomination of Annwesha Hazra

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Annwesha Hazra, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. --- Possibly (talk) 08:16, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Annwesha Hazra for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Annwesha Hazra is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Annwesha Hazra until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

--- Possibly (talk) 08:32, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The sources from https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/tv/news "e-News" are just paid advertising. But maybe you knew that already!--- Possibly (talk) 08:38, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Possibly: Millions of pages are up on the internet that have cited from Times of India.

Some are Chuni Panna, Mohor, Dibyojyoti Dutta, Rahul Banerjee, Nusrat Jahan, and so I have also done the same thing to my article. And I really don't find a cause for it to be deleted. Mynameisparitoshmandal (talk) 09:41, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hazraann (May 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Hazraann instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Same topic as Annwesha Hazra. The draft's creator has declared a paid conflict of interest with that article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hazraann and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Hazraann, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 12:54, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mynameisparitoshmandal, I just noticed that you had placed a speedy deletion request on this draft, which I removed by accident – sorry about that. I have restored it to the draft. Regards, --bonadea contributions talk 13:08, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Daniel (talk) 04:35, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request for unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mynameisparitoshmandal (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have never done disruptive editing. I only created a page Annwesha Hazra. It is because I had been paid for it. Some said that it is an advertisement, but there is not a single word in that page which says that it is an advertisement. And some also said that it does not meet WP:GNG. But, how can I make my client understand these. BUt amidist all these, I have never done anything wrong, for myself to be blocked. Respected administrator, please unblock me. Yours faithfully Mynameisparitoshmandal (talk) 04:12, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It's advertising because you are just telling about the person; you don't have to be shopping your client around for customers to be promoting them. The larger concern here is your actions to protect what you wrote from deletion, including harassing the user who nominated the article at issue for deletion with unfounded reports of misbehavior. If you are unable to accept what the community decides with regards to your work, you shouldn't be editing here, and if you are being specifically paid to write this article, you will need to return the money and find something else to do. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 09:09, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Socking

Note that this account was confirmed to be using five other accounts; see this SPI.--- Possibly (talk) 23:56, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Shreema Bhattacharyajee

Hello, Mynameisparitoshmandal. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Shreema Bhattacharyajee, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:01, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]