User talk:Myconcern
Welcome Myconcern!
I'm Vincentvikram, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.
| Some pages of helpful information to get you started: | Some common sense Dos and Don'ts:
|
| If you need further help, you can: | or you can: | or even: |
Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type {{helpme}} here on your talk page and someone will try to help.
There are many ways you can contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:
|
|
To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can create your own personal sandbox for use any time. It's perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put {{My sandbox}} on your user page. By the way, seeing as you haven't created a user page yet, simply click here to start it.
Please remember to:
- Always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the
button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to your talk page, and a timestamp. - Leave descriptive edit summaries for your edits. Doing so helps other editors understand what changes you have made and why you made them.
April 2021
[edit]
Hello, I'm Vincentvikram. An edit that you recently made to IIT Bombay seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Vikram Vincent 14:17, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Please stop overlinking articles. There is no need to link common words which most readers will know, or to link the names of countries. Please take a moment to read MOS:OL, and consider returning to many of the articles you have overlinked and making appropriate changes. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 10:38, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Positive youth justice, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Stop linking common words and country names. Magnolia677 (talk) 12:55, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
I'm really sorry for that. Next time, I'll avoid those things. Myconcern (talk) 07:17, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Vithalbhai Radadiya
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Vithalbhai Radadiya requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CommanderWaterford (talk) 12:09, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Gajendrasinh parmar
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Gajendrasinh parmar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. SunDawn (talk) 06:36, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
Gajendrasinh parmar
[edit]Hello, I removed the CSD but you still need to address multiple issues. You have written number of vote counts twice - which one of that is true? Or they are for two different elections? Please clarify. Also add more categories and information. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 07:34, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
Fathima Thahiliya
[edit]hello, can you help this article Fathima Thahiliya deletion review User:Msp7com 11:47, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
- Please check WP:NPOL & WP:GNG. You can reach out to me if you think he is meeting the guidelines in the future. Myconcern (talk) 11:50, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
May 2021
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. MER-C 14:29, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
Myconcern (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Can someone please explain me that what was so promotional line in my page that I got blocked? I don't think I am that bad editor, please unblock me Myconcern (talk) 16:48, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I ignored nothing, everything is listed in the block log as I stated. Don't take my word for it, but it states "Using Wikipedia for spam or advertising purposes, likely covert advertising and sock/meatpuppetry - see Draft:1mg". I don't think that you are editing about these topics at random. If you think that you can convince another administrator that you are, you may make a new request, I am declining this one. 331dot (talk) 17:40, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
What is your connection to the subjects of your edits? 331dot (talk) 09:28, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
- @331dot:,I have done so many edits. All the govt schemes pages I created to learn. 1mg I created due to Ratan Tata's recent investment news also planned to create Generic Aadhar but I do not find good sources so dropped the plan. Politician pages I created because of my interest in politics. Books I created based on What I liked long back, also planned to create a few more but they already exist on Wikipedia. I edit and create random pages because it makes me happy and a feeling of a team player. Myconcern (talk) 18:58, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
- I have removed the unblock formatting from your reply. There is no need for every reply to be inside an
{{unblock}}template. !ɘM γɿɘυϘ⅃ϘƧ 22:11, 2 June 2021 (UTC)- @331dot: Can you please share the reason of blocking me? Also, I can see one "new" editor checked my sockpuppet issue. https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Myconcern/Archive Myconcern (talk) 15:43, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
- The reason for the block is stated in the block notice above, as well as the Block Log. 331dot (talk) 15:46, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
- @331dot: Thanks for ignoring sockpuppet issue, my replies, my old edits and all the pages but please share how I have done "advertising or self-promoting" just because one person feel it. Please share the block log if there is one more discussion about me, I don't know where to search. Myconcern (talk) 16:23, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
- The reason for the block is stated in the block notice above, as well as the Block Log. 331dot (talk) 15:46, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
- @331dot: Can you please share the reason of blocking me? Also, I can see one "new" editor checked my sockpuppet issue. https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Myconcern/Archive Myconcern (talk) 15:43, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Myconcern (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Wikipedia works on what can be verified, not on what we think this is what the last admin is explaining to other blocked users. I am blocked without warning just because I created 1mg without checking the background (not easy to check!)? When I created 1mg the old draft was looking clean with zero such tags. I created so many pages which are following the guidelines and already sockpuppet verification is done. Please unblock me, this is not my fault. Please put yourself in my shoe. * Block is not necessary because I am not doing any damage based on so many edits. * Block is no longer necessary because I understand that I have to check the complete history and ignore those pages which were created by someone in past. Also decided not to create any company page in future. * My IP is not related to any block or any account. Myconcern (talk) 09:26, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 11:52, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Speedy deletion nomination of Mamata Scheme
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Mamata Scheme, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Onel5969 TT me 01:08, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Biju Kanya Ratna Yojana
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Biju Kanya Ratna Yojana, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Onel5969 TT me 16:43, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Biju Yuva Shashaktikaran Yojana (BYSY)
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Biju Yuva Shashaktikaran Yojana (BYSY) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://sambadenglish.com/odisha-students-to-get-cash-instead-of-laptop-know-how-to-apply/, https://govinfo.me/biju-yuva-sashaktikaran-yojana/, and https://yojanasarkari.in/biju-yuva-sashaktikaran-yojana/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Onel5969 TT me 02:40, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Biju Saharanchala Vidyutikaran Yojana (BSVY)
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Biju Saharanchala Vidyutikaran Yojana (BSVY) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/odisha-electrifies-2-2-million-more-households-achieves-power-for-all-119020400936_1.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. rsjaffe 🗩 🖉 03:30, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Nazaqat
[edit] Hello, Myconcern. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nazaqat, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:01, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
An article you recently created, Nazaqat, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE💕 18:16, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nazaqat until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.