User talk:Muuse8

August 2023

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Eidagale have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Eidagale was changed by Muuse8 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.873511 on 2023-08-28T01:44:21+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:44, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Only as established in Garhajis can the Ciidagalle clan tree be corrected. Jamac yassin (talk) 18:48, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Eidagale. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Materialscientist (talk) 02:39, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Eidagale have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Eidagale was changed by Muuse8 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.952244 on 2023-09-01T16:22:01+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:22, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your article Draft:Abokor Muuse

Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page Draft:Abokor Muuse to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. Pages in foreign languages will not be kept here, and may be deleted if they are not translated into English. Thank you. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 06:15, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

First and foremost, I am requesting that Wikipedia follow its policy and publish this article in Somali because this tribe is Somali. If any foreigners wish to view it, however, they may do so in any language in the world. In addition, I am grateful to wikipedia holders for their support in enabling me to demonstrate how the abokor muuse clan was concealed by some individuals of his ethnicity. Muuse8 (talk) 08:07, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have changed the language to English Muuse8 (talk) 08:40, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Hello, I'm Thriftycat. I noticed that in this edit to Garhajis, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Thriftycat ^{Talk • Contribs} 00:17, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Garhajis, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Thriftycat ^{Talk • Contribs} 20:31, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Thriftycat ^{Talk • Contribs} 20:14, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Madhiban—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 09:02, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Madhiban. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 09:04, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Madhiban, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 09:05, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Madhiban. Materialscientist (talk) 09:05, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Samaale, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 13:47, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Samaale, you may be blocked from editing. ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 23:00, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Muuse8! I agree with UrielAcosta below. Please do not change information that is already sourced and cite external sources for any new information you add (please do not cite Wikipedia articles: see Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a reliable source). In addition, please use the edit summary field to explain your edits, especially when you remove information, such as you did here [1][2][3]. The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. If you do not heed these warnings, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. To avoid this, please respond to this message. If you have any questions, please ask them, as I will be happy to help you. Thanks, ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 19:24, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do not use Wikipedia as a source

Please stop adding citations from Wikipedia itself, which as a user-edited site is not a reliable source (see: WP:CIRCULAR).
And, of course, stop making changes to sourced information. If you don't understand why your edits have been reverted then ask on a talk page, but stop your edit warring. UrielAcosta (talk) 16:25, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User:Muuse8. Thank you. ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 13:31, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for failure to discuss editing and reverts on article talk pages when required..

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

You have now made 400+ edits to Wikipedia, nearly all to articles - and not once have you edited an article talk page. In many cases they have been wholesale removal of content. In some situations, you have been reverted - but then just go back and continue to make the same edits, in effect edit warring.

You must start using the article talk page. Please read WP:BRD and WP:DR and once you have, confirm that you have read and understood your responsibilities around discussion - and commit to following them moving forward. Place the unblock template on your talk page with that commitment and understanding, and you will be unblocked by any uninvolved administrator.

Daniel (talk) 20:02, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Abokor Muuse

Hello, Muuse8. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Abokor Muuse, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:05, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Muuse Ismaciil Qalinle

Hello, Muuse8

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Dclemens1971, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Muuse Ismaciil Qalinle, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Dclemens1971}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:28, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Muuse Ismaciil Qalinle

Hello Muuse8, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Muuse Ismaciil Qalinle, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muuse Ismaciil Qalinle.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Dclemens1971}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Dclemens1971 (talk) 19:09, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]