User talk:Muthuraja29

Welcome!

Hello, Muthuraja29, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! It'sIEXISTTOHELP talk 04:44, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Hello, I'm Utcursch. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Vijayalaya Chola, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. utcursch | talk 20:36, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Muthuraja

Hi, I realise that you mean well with your contributions to Muthuraja but your choice of sources is poor. For example, using ancient inscriptions and/or interpretations of them made by people during the British Raj era is not a good idea. - Sitush (talk) 10:30, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have had to revert you again because you are still using sources from the Raj era. It's great that you are trying to source your statements but we must use reliable ones and the consensus of the Wikipedia community has long been that Raj sources are rarely reliable. Can you find anything more recent for your claims? - Sitush (talk) 12:21, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you have removed The temple section is removed mentioned as no source. I give the reference here for Vijayalaya choleeswaram please refer MANUAL OF THE PUDUKKOTTAI STATE PUDUKKOTTAI STATE: Volume II Part II (Second and Revised Edition) published 2002 by K.R. VENKAT ARAMA AYYAR page no 1074 under the heading of The Vijayalaya choleeswaram^[1] Muthuraja29--Muthuraja29 (talk) 12:02, 31 December 2017 (UTC) (talk)[reply]

December 2017

The Wikipedia community has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions on any editor who is active on any page about social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties, related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or a topic ban. The discussion leading to the imposition of these sanctions can be read here.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:General sanctions/South Asian social groups.

—SpacemanSpiff 09:50, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Mutharaiyar Dynasty

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Mutharaiyar Dynasty, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images from either web sites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from http://www.e-books-chennaimuseum.tn.gov.in%2FChennaiMuseum%2Fimages%2Fbooks%2FMANUAL%2520OF%2520PUDUKKOTTAI%2520STATE%2520VOLUME%2520II%2520PART%2520I.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0_8uAuC3kczOYILI6kpEGV, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Mutharaiyar Dynasty and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Mutharaiyar Dynasty, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Mutharaiyar Dynasty. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Mutharaiyar Dynasty with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Mutharaiyar Dynasty saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Travelbird (talk) 15:29, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for agenda editing mixed with copyvios.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —SpacemanSpiff 15:43, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Muthuraja29 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i will not do any direct source of information without permit ion concern authority.(Mutharaiyar Dynasty) page this my mistake actually i have copy of this book i will add the reference only to the page. i will never do any modification in Muthuraja page i never added cast related information in the Muthuraja page.

Decline reason:

You have not addressed your violations of WP:NPOV. Yamla (talk) 17:04, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Muthuraja29 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i will not do any direct source of information without permit ion concern authority.(Mutharaiyar Dynasty) page this my mistake actually i have copy of this book i will add the reference only to the page. please also refer web page http://www.e-books-chennaimuseum.tn.gov.in/ChennaiMuseum/ this is gov of Tamil Nadu website they mention in there page clearly for ebook you can use for reference I used as reference only

Decline reason:

You still have not addressed the fact that, no matter how well-referenced your editing is, it does not adhere to a netural point of view. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 09:22, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Muthuraja29 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

you are telling I not following neutrality in my document I will address this issue. in further my documentation I will follow the rules.

Decline reason:

How? It's all very well to say, "I will follow the rules", but that doesn't tell us that you know what the rules actually are. How do you intend to make sure that the edits you make in the future conform to the NPOV policy? Can you point to examples of your previous edits which did not follow this policy, and suggest what you could have done instead? Can you provide an example of the sort of edit you might make if unblocked? Yunshui ^雲 _水 14:33, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Muthuraja29 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

1. I create page called page Mutharaiyar Dynasty content what contentment I have I will just type information. Did not read completely then write neutrally view of author it impact policy of wiki.
2. I made one undo transaction on muthuraja page without mentioning reason. All the time write reason but did not do.at the time Unknown person editing Muthuraja page.
3. I logged two time in different place. However, I have only one account I need to complete the document that is reason I login. I include eBook directly in my page reference it also violation.
4. I copy the template structure to use Mutharaiyar dynasty page. This major mistake made. Also frequently editing the template. I include this template in world dynasty. Not in Dynasties of India category.
5. Muthuraja page this is general page not social group page. Most of error fixed myself. Unknown person adding social group content instead of create a new page Muthuraja Caste – the page it give issues.

Decline reason:

Declining, as none of the concerns were addressed, and the incoherent request is not helping. Revoking talk page access due to persistence of poor unblock requests, next request should be submitted through Wikipedia:Unblock Ticket Request System. Alex Shih (talk) 16:57, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

13:02, 9 December 2017

(→‎Lake:  fix the link error)  please see the current page I have fixed error you are removing without reason I mentioned error fixed but still you are removing. Muthuraja29 User:SpacemanSpiff

Muthuraja Revision as of 16:05, 27 December 2017

The temple section is removed mentioned as no link. I give the reference here for Vijayalaya choleeswaram please refer MANUAL OF THE PUDUKKOTTAI STATE PUDUKKOTTAI STATE: Volume II Part II (Second and Revised Edition) published 2002 by K.R. VENKAT ARAMA AYYAR page no 1074 under the heading of The Vijayalaya choleeswaram Muthuraja29 User:Sitush

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Muthuraja29 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #20205 was submitted on Jan 01, 2018 09:37:25. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 09:37, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

^ "MANUAL OF THE PUDUKKOTTAI STATE". PUDUKKOTTAI STATE. II Part II (2002): 1074.

[Vijayalaya_choleeswaram-1] "MANUAL OF THE PUDUKKOTTAI STATE". PUDUKKOTTAI STATE. II Part II (2002): 1074.

[1]