User talk:Muskan1017

Reply

Hi, thanks for message. You can sign your comments automatically using four tildes ~~~~. I deleted your article because

it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the company, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company claims or interviewing its management. References should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls. You gave a list of supposed references at the end, but they were not in-line, and none of them actually linked to anything, so useless as references and impossible to check whether they were genuine third-party sources as linked above.
There's nothing in the text to show why you are notable. To show notability you need hard verifiable facts such as the number of employees, turnover or profits
it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Examples of unsourced claims presented as fact include: unbiased research... The company has expertise... helps to provide recommendations to traders ... anticipates the impact... and provides support, resistance and pivot point for both equity and commodities... It promises to accelerate the mission... Ranked on Deloitte Technology Fast 50 Awards 2012... Winner of ET-NOW IndianMART Leaders of Tomorrow Awards, 2012
the article was created in a single edit without wikilinks or references, and looks as if was copied from an unknown and possibly copyrighted source. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, and text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.
You said help us make the required changes. If you have a conflict of interest when editing this article, you must declare it. If, after reading the information about notability linked above, you still believe that your organisation is notable enough for a Wikipedia article (and that there is significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources), you could, if you wish, post a request at Wikipedia:Requested articles for the article to be created. See also guidance for editors with conflicts of interest.
If you work directly or indirectly for the organisation, or otherwise are acting on its behalf, you are very strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly. Regardless, if you are paid directly or indirectly by the organisation you are writing about, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Muskan1017. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Muskan1017|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared. Concealing a COI can lead to a block. Please do not edit further until you respond to this message.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article, since you clearly hadn't looked at any of our guidance for editing, and appear not to have even looked to see what an article should look like.

You must reply to the COI request above Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:05, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]