User talk:Mushroomexpertboy

August 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Amanita muscaria has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Amanita muscaria was changed by Mushroomexpertboy (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.950247 on 2015-08-19T21:27:51+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:27, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Donner60. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Diamond with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.Donner60 (talk) 04:21, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

Hello, I'm R45. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Keith Rowley because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -- R45 ^talk! 21:45, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Keith Rowley. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -- R45 ^talk! 13:47, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nathan Baptiste

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nathan Baptiste requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. RA0808 ^talk _contribs 01:16, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Nathan Baptiste. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. RA0808 ^talk _contribs 01:24, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 04:29, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]