User talk:Murz97

Reply

Hi, thanks for message. I deleted your article because

it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines.It is now Wikipedia policy that biographical articles about living people must have independent verifiable references, as defined in the link, or they will be deleted. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to him, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the he claims or interviewing him. You gave no references at all
He seems to be virtually unknown. No age or place of birth (India is a bit vague), and none of the shows or channels are linked to Wikipedia articles, so probably not notable either
it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Examples of unsourced claims presented as fact include: produced some popular shows... most popular show of his production career... credited so many accolades in a short span of time... show becomes very popular... one of the most successful show of the channel... received huge accolades for his effort... has become very successful shows... make them popular among the viewers.— it's a fanpage
If you have a conflict of interest when editing this article, you must declare it. If, after reading the information about notability linked above, you still believe that hen is notable enough for a Wikipedia article (and that there is significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources), you could, if you wish, post a request at Wikipedia:Requested articles for the article to be created. See also Wikipedia:Best practices for editors with conflicts of interest.

Please look at other biographies to see what is required in terms of good third-party references and a neutral tone Jimfbleak - talk to me? 09:24, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

HI Jimfbleak - talk to me?,

For the notable sources here are the links about him few of them are from the leading newspaper in India

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/hindi/music/news/Vikas-Gupta-to-perform-live-in-Thailand/articleshow/51024744.cms

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/tv/news/hindi/Vikas-Gupta-My-show-is-not-an-adaptation-of-Game-of-Thrones/articleshow/46758458.cms

http://www.afaqs.com/news/story/42831_Vikas-Gupta-programming-head-MTV-quits

http://www.indiantelevision.com/television/tv-channels/people/vikas-gupta-to-join-tv-as-head-of-fiction-programming-150821

http://bollywoodhelpline.com/news-gossips/telly-buzz/pyaar-tune-kya-kiya-to-see-vikas-gupta-to-co-host-the-finale/34042

http://www.indiantelevision.com/television/tv-channels/people/vikas-gupta-bids-adieu-to-mtv-india-141220

Few of his work on Wikipedia where his name has also been mentioned are as follows

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/MTV_Fanaah

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Gumrah:_End_of_Innocence

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Kyunki_Saas_Bhi_Kabhi_Bahu_Thi

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Kahaani_Hamaaray_Mahaabhaarat_Ki

For neutral tone I will work on the changes again as suggested by you also if you can help in editing the article to make it more neutral will be of great help.

For COI Clause - I do know him personally as he is a friend on my friend so i have met him couple of times, which i really feel should not be the reason why I cant dit the article

Your further advice on these things to restore the article will be of great help. Thanks my email id is murz97@gmail.com Murz97 (talk) 07:26, 29 August 2016 (UTC)murz97[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vikas Gupta (producer) (August 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please expand on this stub. This draft really does not contain enough information about its subject to justify an article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vikas Gupta (producer) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 16:53, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Murz97, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 16:53, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vikas Gupta (October 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chris troutman was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vikas Gupta and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chris Troutman (talk) 14:13, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of BIG Dhillon

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on BIG Dhillon requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Winged Blades^Godric 12:31, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Vikas Gupta concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Vikas Gupta, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Musskan Sethi has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Musskan Sethi. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 11:57, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Musskan Sethi (September 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

See history of deletion of previous article. Do not resubmit without showing how this draft is better than the deleted article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Musskan Sethi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Musskan Sethi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 11:59, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Musskan Sethi (December 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:NACTOR, has only featured in a single film. Personal interviews are primary sources. Requires significant coverage in multiple independent verifiable secondary sources. A case of WP:TOOSOON.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Musskan Sethi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Musskan Sethi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 07:11, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Musskan Sethi

Hello, Murz97. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Musskan Sethi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Interstellarity T 🌟 12:01, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]