User talk:Murdox/GNAA

This page was nominated for deletion on 19 January 2011. The result of the discussion was snowball keep.

This page was nominated for deletion on 31 August 2010. The result of the discussion was snowball keep.

Policy to keep in mind when editing

LiteralKa (talk) 22:36, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sources to add

[1]
[2]

LiteralKa (talk) 06:14, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GNAA logo

Here's the original Commons one, as rendered by Sam Hocevar. I've just restored it seeing as this work is ongoing here. The colors are a little better than the current revision you guys have - Alison ^❤ 03:49, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! LiteralKa (talk) 04:49, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

parallel work in progress

I started an attempt at a legitimately sourced article after bringing the topic up at DRV a few months back. Rather than duplicate efforts, I'm willing to offer my work in progress to be merged in with this article. riffic (talk) 16:12, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you feel like you can improve or contribute to my draft in any way, especially sourcing RE: Gay Niggers From Outer Space, go ahead and edit my userspace draft. TIA Murdox (talk) 19:36, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

you've already got all the sources I had included, except the Andrew Lih citation, so I added that in. User:Riffic/Gay Nigger Association of America now redirects here.

White vs grey

This is a pretty good article you have here, I'm impressed. I noticed that you describe Goatse security as White hat, quoting the Washington Post. The Register refers to them as Grey hat, however. It might be worth mentioning the disagreement in the article. Qrsdogg (talk) 02:11, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

YouTube citations

2girls1cup is riddled with them, they seem to be okay to use. LiteralKa (talk) 06:13, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Goatse Security

There's now a Goatse Security article in case anyone here wishes to contribute to it. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 20:37, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cleaned up refs

I cleaned it up so all the ref naming is at the bottom, making the source actually possible to read. LiteralKa (talk) 20:46, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]