Jump to content

User talk:Mundhravinit

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

vinit mundhra (talk) 20:13, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Indian Air Force

[edit]

Thanks for you in-put in the article dealing with Indian Air force aircraft, however your edit/s have been removed. The Table has been cleaned up, with one source, therefore making the article much more accurate. Please by all means add content to the article using good sources. I do warn you any future edits like your previous will only result in a removal as it’s seen as vandalism.Rademire (talk) 09:01, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Indian Air Force 2

[edit]

I have reliable sources which show the Mig-21 bison is in serivce with 124 aircraft. The older Mig-21 variants are being removed by 2012. The removal started in 2007 and have scince been replaced by new 4th gen Aircraft. Today the older Mig-21s are no longer in service.

Rademire (talk) 20:37, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Indian air force

[edit]

Ok, then make a note and say they are for training. but remember, they are not fighter aircraft no more and will be replaced by 2012 Rademire (talk) 20:55, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • That list includes Active service aircraft. The older Mig-21s are not in the active fleet, they are being retired and in reserve for training.

plus the Mig-21 is too old and obsolete, but please, if you find a source which says all those old Mig-21s are in active service then please edit the list : )Rademire (talk) 21:08, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Source

[edit]

Look, when you have a source, then up date the list and add the link to the source so other people (and me) can look at the source. Ok? Yes my source looks realistic, but can be up dated when you provide new sources.

I hope the Indian airforce you contacted will give some good sources. But I will need to see them before you edit!

Good luck and thank you for your time. I hope we get this list of aircraft accurate and good : ) Rademire (talk) 21:27, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

February 2010

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content (particularly if you change facts and figures), as you have to the article People's Liberation Army Air Force, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. (Hohum @) 20:23, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Oracle Transportation Management has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not established, advertisement

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eeekster (talk) 19:54, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

A tag has been placed on Vinit mundhra requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about it should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you can assert the notability of the subject, . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

See the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. roleplayer 12:31, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]