User talk:Mukeshwarsingh

Welcome!

Hello, Mukeshwarsingh, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Acroterion (talk) 14:00, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Topcoder

Thanks for the edits on Topcoder. Nearly all of your edits helped the article. However, please be careful about changing between US and English or Indian spellings on topics that chiefly pertain to a particular regional variety of English. We generally don't change "spelled" to "spelt"(or vice versa) unless the subject is specifically appropriate to one regional variety - organized/organised, etc also apply. Please see WP:ENGVAR for more on this. Acroterion (talk) 14:04, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A summary of some important site policies and guidelines

Assume other editors are here to help as much as is possible.
N oone owns any article here, or even their edits to articles. At the top of the edit page, it says "Work submitted to Wikipedia can be edited, used, and redistributed—by anyone," which means that if you don't want someone to change or even remove what you add, then you need to use another site.
It is recommended that you do not add anything relating to yourself (or something you're connected to) to article space, and it is expressly forbidden to use Wikipedia to promote anything about yourself (or something you're connected to). -- Because you knew Tom Zenk, you have a conflict of interest.
Vandalism is defined as a deliberate attempt to mess up the site. It does not include real accidents (although competence is required), nor does it include someone trying to improve the encyclopedia in a way you disagree with.
"Truth" is not the only criteria for inclusion, verifiability is also required.
We do not publish original thought nor original research. We're not a blog, we're not here to promote any ideology.
Always cite a source for any new information. When adding this information to articles, use <ref>reference tags like this</ref>, containing the name of the source, the author, page number, publisher or web address (if applicable).
Reliable sources typically include: articles from mainstream magazines or newspapers (particularly scholarly journals), or books by recognized authors (basically, books by respected publishers). Online versions of these are usually accepted, provided they're held to the same standards. User generated sources (like Wikipedia) are to be avoided. Self-published sources should be avoided except for information by and about the subject that is not self-serving (for example, citing a company's website to establish something like year of establishment).
Articles are to be written from a neutral point of view. Wikipedia is not concerned with facts or opinions, it just summarizes reliable sources. Real scholarship actually does not say what understanding of the world is "true," but only with what there is evidence for.

~ Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me) 14:42, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Mukeshwarsingh! You created a thread called About Some Articles at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bhuvan Bam short film

Hi there, re: this edit, as an extension of WP:NFF, we only care about a subject's work in film once principal photography has begun. This is because anything can derail a planned film. If they've begun filming, it indicates an actual commitment of time and money that's more likely to be finished. If you can prove that filming has begun, the content can be restored. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:38, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reported your affiliate spam to Google and Wikipedia

I've removed your affiliate spam and have reported your websites directly to the Google Webspam team with further documenting of your spamming. Wikipedia is not a place for spamming or affiliate nonsense, so stay away.

lifejacketexpert.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com

glowindarkpaint.net: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com

This is your only warning; if you insert a spam link to Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines.