User talk:Muhammd Fajar

Welcome!

Hi Muhammd Fajar! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! CommanderWaterford (talk) 09:11, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Muhammd Fajar (talk) 00:15, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Features of Firefox have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Features of Firefox was changed by Muhammd Fajar (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.880809 on 2021-04-20T09:20:55+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:20, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. Muhammd Fajar (talk) 09:26, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm HurricaneEdgar. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Milan Mandarić, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! HurricaneEdgar 04:26, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Agop Donabidian, you may be blocked from editing. Nehme₁₄₉₉ 12:01, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Muhammd Fajar. Nehme₁₄₉₉ 14:20, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:34, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information.

User IPA

ipa-4
ə

This user has a near-complete understanding of the International Phonetic Alphabet.

Muhammd Fajar (talk) 01:45, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

1

This user page has been vandalized 1 times.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Muhammd Fajar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want to unblock in 24 April Muhammd Fajar (talk) 23:15, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. 331dot (talk) 08:14, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Muhammd Fajar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want to unblock in 30 April Muhammd Fajar (talk) 23:15, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 15:46, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You are not permitted to edit or remove declined unblock requests for your currently active block. Do not do so again. --Yamla (talk) 15:47, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

While blocked, your talk page should be used to discuss your block (and any potential unblock). Continuing to post material irrelevant to that end may result in a revocation of your ability to edit it. --Kinu ^t/_c 14:55, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

unblocker

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Muhammd Fajar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My user account was created 4 weeks ago. It's to edit articles, and other contents I need. Later I have been blocked from editing and never unblocked here because I did not build an appropriate encyclopedia. After I unblocked I decided to build an encyclopedia, but I formerly blocked by administrator here because it is inadequate for reasons. Later I want to wait for a recent edit account, Kinu, who will unblock me.

Decline reason:

I have no idea what you're trying to say here, but since you asked me personally for some inexplicable reason, nothing here convinces me that unblocking you would be beneficial to this project. I'm revoking your talk page access since your unblock requests are a waste of time. Kinu ^t/_c 16:56, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Kinu: Nehme₁₄₉₉ 13:48, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

html

HTML-N

This user sees entities in real life as elements.

Muhammd Fajar (talk) 14:53, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Kinu ^t/_c 16:57, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS 43623

UTRS appeal #43623 is now closed. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 02:14, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS 44675

UTRS appeal #44675 is now closed. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 02:38, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Carlos Safigozalzade

Hello, Muhammd Fajar. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Carlos Safigozalzade, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:01, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Carlos Safigozalzade

Hello, Muhammd Fajar. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Carlos Safigozalzade".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:11, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]