User talk:Mugimeshi

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jaya Ibrahim has been accepted

Jaya Ibrahim, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Quantum^Realm (meow • pawtrack) 15:32, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Speedy tagging

You have insufficient experience to speedy tag articles. Don't do it again. You tagged SPH Lippo Cikarang as a WP:G11; it wasn't even close to being unambiguously promotional. You have been editing Wikipedia using this account for a few weeks. Your editing is not like that of a new editor. What other accounts have you used?--Bbb23 (talk) 17:29, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

Hi Bbb23, I am indeed not a new editor. I have previously edited under User:Okadiputera, of which I retired since around August. I returned to edit after seeing multiple articles that I feel could benefit from improvement. With regards to SPH Lippo Cikarang, I am surprised that it does not come close to being "unambiguously promotional" in the Wikipedia sense of the term. I have seen articles speedily deleted under WP:G11 having the same sort of content, and written in a similar prose. Mugimeshi (talk) 00:42, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

To add to my comments above, I fail to see the school's notability, given the article's lack of independent sources. As far as I can see, a Google search would only generate press-release sponsored news articles. I considered the following before my tag.

Before 2017, secondary schools were assumed notable unless sources could not be found to prove existence, but following a February 2017 RFC, secondary schools are not presumed to be notable simply because they exist, and are still subject to WP:N and WP:ORG.
— WP:NSCHOOL

Further, given the for-profit nature of the school, I had believe it failed WP:PROMOTION under clause 6.

All article topics must be verifiable with independent, third-party sources, so articles about very small garage bands or local companies are typically unacceptable. Wikipedia articles about a person, company or organization are not an extension of their website, press releases, or other social media marketing efforts.
— WP:PROMO

Regards, Mugimeshi (talk) 00:57, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

I have no idea why you are arguing the school's notability as that's not the issue. And your idea of what makes an article promotional is seriously misguided. As for your accounts, you not only had Okadiputera, but also before that used User:Raymondeuro. From what I can tell, although neither account was ever blocked, you "retired" both accounts because of problems you were having on Wikipedia. At a minimum, you must declare on your present userpage the existence of both accounts. Even with such a declaration, it looks to me like you are avoiding scrutiny (e.g., this account intersects on various articles with your other accounts even though there's no hint that you are the same person), which is not a good thing.--Bbb23 (talk) 03:23, 12 December 2021 (UTC)