User talk:Muamshai

Altaf Hussain & MQM edits by M12390

The only information that is available on Altaf's parents is on MQM's web site unfortunately. I have messaged M12390 repeatedly yet he does not reply. I hope that the article can be improved. I know there are lots of allegations surrounding MQM however I believe that only independently verifiable credible claims are used. In this respect youtube cannot be trusted.

However until M12390 stops his vandalism a clean-up cannot be performed. I hope this helps. Wassallam.Shehzadashiq 07:42, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You continue to spew hate against Altaf Hussain and MQM. Who are you are what is your agenda? 67.87.38.131 20:37, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Muamshai, there are lot of things in top section on Article(Altaf hussian) that should not be there. I want to clean it up and try to stay neutral please stop your vandalism. Statement “He has no intention of going back to Pakistan” is not present any where in the provided reference. That needs to be taken off as soon as possible. I want to keep this article neutral as much as anybody wants on wiki. Top section is not projecting to be neutral opinion. Sr79554 10:33, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I find it quite funny that M12390 is using TW. He only learnt it after seeing us use it. However to be honest let the matter go to administrators and see what happens. M12390 and his sockpuppets claim to want to maintain neutrality yet are so pro MQM that any independent person would be able to adjudicate fairly.

M12390 expects to read every single sentence in a article ad-verbatim from its source. I don't believe he understands the matter of summarising or extracting information.So far M12390 is on his second warning from me. I hope he sees sense rather then letting the matter agravate further. BTW per wikipedia policy you are meant to give a NPOV-1 warning and then slowly progress. I don't think M12390 can grasp that. Wassallam.Shehzadashiq 09:20, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have no sockpuppets. However, Shehzadashiq and Muamshai fit the definition of Meatpuppets by Shehzadashiq's own admission of "He only learnt it after seeing us use it". Your gig is up. Stop vandalizing MQM and Altaf Hussain and other related pages. M12390 23:19, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

From Neutral Ray

I dont think so People are using the credible sources. Mr. M12390 and Mr. Muamshai stop doing Vandalism. You guys are not the father of Wikipedia. Our group is doing research on Political parties in sub continent and you guys are keep changing the contacts of the article. If you guys dont stop then we will report to wikipedia. Thanks

License tagging for Image:VeronikaPagacova.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:VeronikaPagacova.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:08, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

We don't care you are in favor or against the MQM. All we want you guys is stop Vandalism. Who makes you guys owner of these pages?

Muamshai you have no leg to stand on blaming me of Vandalism. You should read the definition first before mindlessly using it. You are insisting on maintaining negative tone on Altaf Hussain and MQM, which has to stop. Let neutral point of view prevail. Thanks M12390 12:52, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

August 2007

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. M12390 02:00, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Muamshai, there are lot of things in top section on Article(Altaf hussian) that should not be there. I want to clean it up and try to stay neutral please stop your vandalism. Statement “He has no intention of going back to Pakistan” is not present any where in the provided reference. That needs to be taken off as soon as possible. I want to keep this article neutral as much as anybody wants on wiki. Top section is not projecting to be neutral opinion. Sr79554 08:52, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Muamshai for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. M12390 23:26, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

December 2007

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to December 2007 Rawalpindi bombing, you will be blocked from editing. Cheers, Dav nel 03^{Sign It, Junior!} 14:08, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Srebren4.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Srebren4.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Rettetast (talk) 21:53, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to E-TEN. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 22:52, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Eurovision Song Contest

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. EuroSong ^talk 09:51, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, your edit re-inserted the garbage. That's why I thought it was you doing the vandalism. However, now I see you were not the original vandal, and your edit was made in good faith - but probably with a hasty, accidental click in Twinkle! Sorry about my own hasty anti-vandal message - I should have seen sooner what was going on. EuroSong ^talk 09:58, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:45, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]