User talk:Msaroff

WP:OR

I see that you have run afoul of the Wikipedia policy of "No original research" WP:NOR. Sadly, it does state "Unsourced material obtained from a Wikipedian's personal experience, such as an unpublished eyewitness account, should not be added to articles." from Wikipedia:PRIMARY#Primary.2C_secondary_and_tertiary_sources. And also WP:SELFCITING "... does prohibit them from drawing on their personal knowledge without citing reliable sources."

While I personally think that there are many instances in which personal knowledge or eyewitness accounts would be helpful to improve Wikipedia content, especially when it is information which will most likely never be published anywhere else, the masses have decreed otherwise. Mostly because there are always trolls online who will abuse things. I do encourage you to continue contributing and improving. — MrDolomite • Talk 09:41, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, Shit

I worked for 3 years on the FCSRMV, and my personal recollections are not enough, but if someone else posted in their blog, that would be OK.

The obvious solution is to create an "Engineer Tuttle," sock-puppet a phony blog, and cite that, but I tend to think that the mature solution is not to draw on personal knowledge to contribute to articles, which means that I should make a major effort to be completely ignorant about what I edit....Which would mean that I could be a political consultant.

I understand the requirement on contentious issues, but the Andropov Story, and the development of the auto-loader on the M8 AGS are not at all contentious.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Msaroff (talk • contribs)

lol - Using blogs as a source probably won't fly as it has to be a source one would use on say a college paper, like from CNN.com or WSJ.com, etc, but I like how you think. Out of luck on the Andropov story, but there may be a website out there that has info on the M8 design. WP has had several instances of editors posing as real life experts, see Essjay controversy for one, and having it come back to bite them. Hope you hang around and continue to improve WP, there's always plenty to fix and improve. :) — MrDolomite • Talk 02:27, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Amity Shlaes

Please join the discussion at http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Talk:Amity_Shlaes#Amity_Shlaes_was_fired_from_the_Financial_Times rather than simply reverting again. Dlabtot (talk) 13:38, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Socking accusations

A Phoenix IP isn't nearly enough evidence to accuse someone of being a sock or meatpuppet for the Cherny campaign [1]. Please be mindful of your edit summaries. Arbor8 (talk) 01:27, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I understand your view, but it's happened a number of times now, and all the IP's track back to Phoenix.

Obviously, my assertion would not be acceptable for a wiki post, but IMHO the edit summary is somewhat more lax in its standard.

Msaroff (talk) 19:00, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Etaoin shrdlu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Linotype. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:22, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Truthdig, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Counterpunch (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:11, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jony Ive, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Butterfly keyboard.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Philip Cross (Wikipedia Editor) (August 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gusfriend was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

See WP:BIO1E.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Philip Cross (Wikipedia Editor) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gusfriend (talk) 07:40, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Msaroff! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Gusfriend (talk) 07:40, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Philip Cross (Wikipedia Editor)

Hello, Msaroff. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Philip Cross (Wikipedia Editor), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:03, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Philip Cross (Wikipedia Editor)

Hello, Msaroff. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Philip Cross".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:53, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:Philip Cross (Wikipedia Editor)

Draft:Philip Cross (Wikipedia Editor), a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Philip Cross (Wikipedia Editor) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Philip Cross (Wikipedia Editor) during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:24, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

Hello, I'm Tiggerjay. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Tom Jefferson (epidemiologist), but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. While you provided a reference, nowhere in the document did it establish any connection to Jefferson but only to a company he was associated with. Feel free to find an appropriate source and you are welcome to resubmit your contribution. TiggerJay (talk) 06:53, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Added a Scientific American link as well Msaroff (talk) 06:54, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for that information, I was able to find the study and have readded that to the article TiggerJay (talk) 10:15, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]