User talk:Msajjad20913

This is Msajjad20913's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Msajjad20913/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Msajjad20913/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 10:24, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Msajjad20913! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 10:24, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Msajjad20913/sandbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Msajjad20913/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://ges.om. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. KylieTastic (talk) 10:24, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Msajjad20913 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I got blocked long ago without knowing wikipedia well enough, Requesting to review this and unblock my account please. Muhammad Sajjad (talk) 07:26, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You were blocked as an undisclosed paid editor, you will still need to address this, and also tell us what edits you want to make. 331dot (talk) 09:49, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Dear 331dot

Thank you for responding to my request block as an undisclosed paid editor. I appreciate the opportunity to address this issue and provide clarification.

Firstly, I want to apologize for any confusions or misunderstanding related to my editing activities on Wikipedia. I very much understand the importance of transparency and adherence to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

I am not a paid editor. I am committed to full transparency and compliance with Wikipedia's policies. I want to assure you that I have no intention of engaging in undisclosed paid editing again.

In response to your request for information about the edits I want to make, I would like to provide details about the specific articles or topics I am interested in contributing to. However, I also understand the need for further clarification regarding my editing intentions and any potential conflicts of interest.

To address these concerns, I am willing to provide additional information about my background, affiliations, and reasons for wanting to edit specific articles. I am also open to discussing any potential conflicts of interest and how they can be mitigated to ensure that my contributions align with Wikipedia's standards of neutrality and verifiability.

Please let me know if there are any specific requirements or steps I need to take to resolve this issue and regain editing privileges on Wikipedia. I am fully committed to working cooperatively with the Wikipedia community to rectify any past mistakes and contribute positively to the platform.

Sincerely, msajjad20913