Jump to content

User talk:MsNika349/sandbox

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Name of student reviewer Keronica Grant
Date of review 5/14/2013
Name of editor Wikipedia User:MsNika349
URL of editor’s Userpage http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:Nika349
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page 05/14/13
Date review submitted to instructor 05/14/13
Length of edit (too long/too short) good length
Image (needed/appropriate) n/a
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) accurate
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed N/A
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) Accurate for I/O Psych
Wikiformatting good
Grammar & composition Good grammar
Other comments Good job

Keronica Grant (talk) 04:55, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Name of student reviewer Wikipedia User:Ant_N_York
Date of review 5/14/2013
Name of editor Wikipedia User:MsNika349
URL of editor’s Userpage http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:Nika349
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page 05/14/13
Date review submitted to instructor 05/14/13
Length of edit (too long/too short) good length
Image (needed/appropriate) n/a
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) accurate
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed N/A
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) Accurate for I/O Psych
Wikiformatting good
Grammar & composition Good grammar & compostition
Other comments Good work!

Ant N York (talk) 21:25, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Name of student reviewer http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:Ashleydf Ashley De Freitas Date of review 5/14/13
Name of editor http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:MsNika34 Shonika Wyllie
URL of editor’s Userpage http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:MsNika349/sandbox
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page 5/8/13
Date review submitted to instructor 5/14/13
Length of edit (too long/too short) Good
Image (needed/appropriate) N/A
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) Accurate
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed N/A
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) Accurate
Wikiformatting Good
Grammar & composition Good
Other comments None

108.41.250.159 (talk) 19:27, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback

Name of student reviewer: Wikipedia User:Cgchapman

    • Replace with username for version on talk page**

Date of review: 04/28/2013

Name of editor: Wkipedia User: MsNika349

    • Replace with username for version on talk page**

URL of editor’s Userpage:http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:MsNika349/sandbox

Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page: 04/28/2013

Date review submitted to instructor

Length of edit (too long/too short):

  • The edit has a good length

Image (needed/appropriate):

  • It might be possible to find an appropriate image but its not really needed.

Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit):

  • Information is accurate

Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed:

  • N/A

Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych):

  • Information was accurate and it realets to I/O psychology

Wikiformatting:

  • wikiformatting was okay

Grammar & composition:

  • Grammer and composition was good.

Other comments:

  • None

Cgchapman (talk) 13:47, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]




Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback

Name of student reviewer: Keronica Grant

    • Replace with username for version on talk page**:MsNika349

Date of review: 5/2/13

Name of editor:MsNika349

URL of editor’s Userpage:http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:MsNika349/sandbox

Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page:4/30/13

Date review submitted to instructor:

Length of edit (too long/too short): perfect length

Image (needed/appropriate): none

Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit): Accurate

Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed: none

Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych): yes

Wikiformatting: good formatting

Grammar & composition: no grammatical error

Other comments: great topic!

--Keronica Grant (talk) 19:35, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback

Name of student reviewer: Neffaterie Thomas

Replace with username for version on talk page**:MsNika349 Date of review: 5/3/13

Name of editor:MsNika349

URL of editor’s Userpage:http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:MsNika349/sandbox

Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page:4/30/13

Date review submitted to instructor:

Length of edit (too long/too short): very good length not to much to read

Image (needed/appropriate): none

Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit): correct

Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed: none

Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych): yes


Wikiformatting: well done

Grammar & composition: no grammatical error

Other comments:


neffateriet (talk)


Name of student reviewer **Replace with username for version on talk page** Wikipedia User: DJames5

Date of review- 5/6/13

Name of editor**Replace with username for version on talk page** MsNika349

URL of editor’s Userpage- http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:MsNika349/sandbox

Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page- 5/6/13

Date review submitted to instructor- 5/6/13

Length of edit (too long/too short)- Good length

Image (needed/appropriate)- n/a

Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit)- Accurate

Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed- n/a

Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych)- Yes

Wikiformatting- Good

Grammar & composition- Good

Other comments- none

DJames5 (talk) 16:54, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Name of student reviewer Wikipedia User:Nae0408
Date of review 5/13/2013
Name of editor Wikipedia User: MsNika349
URL of editor’s Userpage http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:MsNika349/sandbox
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page 5/13/13
Date review submitted to instructor 5/13/13
Length of edit (too long/too short) Good length
Image (needed/appropriate) N/A
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) Accurate
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed N/A
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) Information is Accurate to I/O Psych textbook
Wikiformatting Good formatting
Grammar & composition Good
Other comments Good job

Nae0408 (talk) 02:49, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pre edit peer review

[edit]
Name of student reviewer Wikipedia User: Joan Bailey
Date of review 5/15/2013
Name of editor Wikipedia User: MsNika349
URL of editor’s Userpage http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:MsNika349
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page 05/15/13
Date review submitted to instructor 05/15/13
Length of edit (too long/too short) The length of the edit is Good.
Image (needed/appropriate) N/A
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) Textbook information is accurately edited.
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed N/A
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) The information presented relates to I/O Psych
Wikiformatting Formatting is good.
Grammar & composition Grammar and composition is good.
Other comments Edits are okay!

Joan Bailey (talk) 18:42, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Pre edit peer review

[edit]
Name of student reviewer Mtrowers
Date of review 5/14/2013
Name of editor Wikipedia User:MsNika349
URL of editor’s Userpage http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:Nika349
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page 05/14/13
Date review submitted to instructor 05/14/13
Length of edit (too long/too short) good length
Image (needed/appropriate) n/a
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) symmetrical
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed N/A
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) Accurate for I/O Psych
Wikiformatting Ok
Grammar & composition Good grammar
Other comments Good job