User talk:Mrsevelyn
February 2014
[edit]
Hello, I'm Rsrikanth05. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Paul Smith (television writer) because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Rsrikanth05 (talk) 12:08, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Paul Smith (television writer). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
- If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "
{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. - The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Paul Smith (television writer) was changed by Mrsevelyn (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.862859 on 2014-02-13T14:17:19+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:17, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
[edit]
- Hi ! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 06:48, Friday, January 10, 2025 (UTC)
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Tea with Betty, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0506863/plotsummary.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 09:22, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Tea with Betty
[edit]Hello Mrsevelyn,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Tea with Betty for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Knyzna1 (talk) 15:21, 5 March 2014 (UTC)