User talk:Mrobinson99/sandbox

Peer Review

Peer Review:

After reading your section on the history of the Supreme Court of Georgia, I noticed you included well-written statements that easily explain the history. Most pages are confusing to read but I didn't have to go back to read every word in order to understand what was written. I think it's important to add citations and you did that very well on the actual wikipedia page. I thought the addition of the how the Supreme Court of Georgia was not implemented until a later year than it was established is brilliant and shows that you did your research well __Lroque1 (talk) 14:01, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Response to Peer Review: Thank you for the peer review and taking time to thoroughly read my work rather than just giving me a review based off of nothing. I am going back and fixing up a few details, but thank you for letting me know that overall my section is good! Mrobinson99 (talk) 14:08, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]