User talk:Mrmedit

Welcome to Wikipedia! Need a hand?

Hello! Mrmedit, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SarahStierch (talk) 20:38, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

The point of the speedy deletion procedure is that articles deemed to meet the criteria can be deleted immediately and without discussion. Normally I am happy to sandbox deleted text for users to work on further. The exception is articles like this which are essentially close paraphrasing of copyrighted material.

Copyrighted text is not allowed anywhere in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient. But in any case the copyrighted text is too promotional to be useful for Wikipedia's purposes, so there would not be any point in your jumping through all the hoops that are required.
You also did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. You gave references, but they were not in-line, so it was difficult to know which parts of the text each was supporting.
It was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Lots of aims and claims, few hard facts

You would do better to start from scratch Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:45, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

looking again, I may have been a bit hard on you. I'd just deleted an article with similar problems, but with the key difference that it was clearly intended to promote a company. I'll post the deleted text here shortly. It's up to you whether you still feel that you want to work on it, but please copy it to your hard drive in any case, since I'll redelete if you don't want to use it in the near future. My apologies for being unduly uncharitable, since your intentions were not in bad faith. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 19:13, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've made these edits, formatting, added a couple of links, removed address (non-encylopaedic). I've changed the "References" to "Further reading" since I can't see how they are being used as refs, and I removed one which already appears in the reflist.

I think you really need to make notability clearer. I've no idea of how many individual ~~and organisational~~ members there are, what it's funding is (sources and amount). You also need at least one more reference. At present, the whole of the first paragraph is unsourced, and your two refs are to the organisation itself and to someone who appears to be associated. Something sourced to the national parks service or the historic sites organisation would be good. It's up to you when you move this back to article space (you should see a "move" tab somewhere) but I'd suggest these additions to make it a bit more fireproof Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:05, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Looks OK to me. The financial stuff isn't critical, I was just trying to get a bit more meat in the article, in case there were any queries about notability from other editors, but I think you should move it to article space now, good luck Jimfbleak - talk to me? 19:09, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'd rather assumed that you would move straight to article space rather than go back to AfC, since I've effectively already reviewed the article. It's up to you, but if you do decide to move it again, untick the "leave a redirect" box when you do, so it's cleared at AfC. Obviously there is nothing to stop any editor amending or commenting on the article at any time Jimfbleak - talk to me? 09:02, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Now at National Collaborative for Women's History Sites, removed from AfC, let me know if any problems Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:44, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Mrmedit. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by McDoob AU93 15:39, 7 August 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Dublin Seminar for New England Folklife - ISBN error

Hello. I've been working to fix invalid ISBNs in articles, which led me to this article and this edit. The cite for Puritan Gravestone Art shows an error. This is because you have put a different kind of identifier (an OCLC control number) in the ISBN field. This OCLC control number links to the online copy of this item but I've noticed that you've also included a different OCLC control number in the url that links to the print copy of this item, so to fix this properly I need to know which one you actually used. To be clear, I'd like to change this:

Benes, Peter (1977). Puritan Gravestone Art. Boston: Published jointly by Boston University and the Dublin Seminar. ISBN 557980715. {{cite book}}: Check |isbn= value: length (help)

to either this (if you referred to the print version):

Benes, Peter (1977). Puritan Gravestone Art. Boston: Published jointly by Boston University and the Dublin Seminar. OCLC 12705455.

or this (if you referred to the online version):

Benes, Peter (1977). Puritan Gravestone Art. Boston: Published jointly by Boston University and the Dublin Seminar. OCLC 557980715.

Do you recall which version of the reference you actually used?TuxLibNit (talk) 22:07, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Super--thanks so very much for this! I don't recall which version, but I think the print version would be better. Thanks!

Women's History Sites (U.S. National Park Service)

Please do wikilinks correctly. It is [[Ohio]] not [https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Ohio Ohio]. They even look different on the page... Ohio vs. Ohio.

Also, there should be no blank links between items in a list. Bgwhite (talk) 06:00, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of historic houses in Massachusetts, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Strong House. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:48, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Mrmedit. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Applied history, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ernest May (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Mrmedit. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Peter Benes, from its old location at User:Mrmedit/Peter Benes. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. UnitedStatesian (talk) 13:27, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peter Benes (July 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chris troutman was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Subject fails WP:ANYBIO because his awards aren't notable. What he wrote isn't notable nor does the fact that he wrote stuff make him notable. We need to see in-depth coverage about him, specifically, from independent reliable sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Peter Benes and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Peter Benes, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chris Troutman (talk) 01:01, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mrmedit! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Chris Troutman (talk) 01:01, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Mrmedit! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Help with establishing notability, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Survey about History on Wikipedia (If you reside in the United States)

I am Petros Apostolopoulos, a Ph.D. candidate in Public History at North Carolina State University. My Ph.D. project examines how historical knowledge is produced on Wikipedia. You must be 18 years of age or older, reside in the United States to participate in this study. If you are interested in participating in my research study by offering your own experience of writing about history on Wikipedia, you can click on this link https://ncsu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9z4wmR1cIp0qBH8. There are minimal risks involved in this research.

If you have any questions, please let me know. Petros Apostolopoulos, paposto@ncsu.edu Apolo1991 (talk) 17:16, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Peter Benes

Hello, Mrmedit. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Peter Benes, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:03, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Peter Benes

Hello, Mrmedit. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Peter Benes".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:34, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]