User talk:Mrfebruary

Welcome!

Hello, Mrfebruary, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!

AfD nomination of Canterbury Regional Council (Environment Canterbury)

Canterbury Regional Council (Environment Canterbury), an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Canterbury Regional Council (Environment Canterbury) satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canterbury Regional Council (Environment Canterbury) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Canterbury Regional Council (Environment Canterbury) during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.-gadfium 00:47, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Central Plains Water Enhancement Scheme Timeline

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Central Plains Water Enhancement Scheme Timeline, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Central Plains Water Enhancement Scheme Timeline. Captain panda 23:34, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Central Plains Water Enhancement Scheme Timeline

An editor has nominated Central Plains Water Enhancement Scheme Timeline, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Central Plains Water Enhancement Scheme Timeline and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 08:59, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Ecan-backlog-11-02-08.jpeg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Ecan-backlog-11-02-08.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 11:59, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good work

Keep up the good work on Canterbury and on environmental issues. I like the new graph that you made for the resource consent article. Cheers. -- Alan Liefting- (talk) - 20:36, 22 March 2008 (UTC) Thank you.Mrfebruary (talk) 00:53, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Local Government Act 2002

What work, if any, are you doing on the state of the district report? RoddyYoung (talk) 17:28, 20 August 2008 (UTC) Umm, none. Mrfebruary (talk) 12:16, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:NZ National-poll-variability-2005-08.jpeg

Thank you for uploading images/media to Wikipedia! As you may know, there is another Wikimedia Foundation project called Wikimedia Commons, a central media repository for all free media. In future, please upload media there instead (see m:Help:Unified login). That way, all of the other language Wikipedias can use them too, as well as our many sister projects. This will also allow our visitors to search for, view and use our media in one central location. If you wish to move previous uploads to Commons, see Wikipedia:Moving images to the Commons (you may view previous uploads by going to your user contributions on the left and choosing the 'image' namespace from the drop down box (or see [1]). Please note that non-free content, such as images claimed as fair use, cannot be uploaded to the Wikimedia Commons. Help us spread the word about Commons by informing other users, and please continue uploading! Richard001 (talk) 23:23, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Climate change in the United Kingdom

There is a discussion at Talk:Climate change in the United Kingdom about the merits of the article that you may want to wade into. Cheers. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 20:31, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Baring Head

I created a Baring Head page. I think NIWA operates the CO2 monitoring? You may know more about it? -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 06:57, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism of the IPCC AR4

Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia! In case you are not already aware, an article to which you have recently contributed, Criticism of the IPCC AR4, is on article probation. A detailed description of the terms of article probation may be found at Wikipedia:General sanctions/Climate change probation. Also note that the terms of some article probations extend to related articles and their associated talk pages.

The above is a templated message. Please accept it as a routine friendly notice, not as a claim that there is any problem with your edits. Thank you. -- TS 13:05, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Christchurch meetup

Hello to all Christchurch based Wikipedians. It must be high time that we all got out from behind our computers and had a meetup. Somewhere with free wireless access would be ideal so we can get our caffine/sugar/alcohol/nutrient fix along with our Wikipedia fix!! Reply at Wikipedia:New Zealand Wikipedians' notice board#Christchurch meetup. Please let any other Chrischurch Wikipedians who not listed at Category:Wikipedians in Christchurch know of this event. Cheers. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 08:42, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dictionary

Collins Dictionary^[1] Oxford Dictionary^[2]

^ Collins English Dictionary: 30th Anniversary Edition. London: Collins. 2009. ISBN 0-00-729846-3.
^ Brown, Lesley; Stevenson, Angus (2007). Shorter Oxford English dictionary on historical principles (sixth ed.). Oxford [Oxfordshire]: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-920687-2.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)

Water pollution in Canterbury

You may be interested in the Water pollution in Canterbury article that I wrote? -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 12:02, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Thank you. I have added it to my watch list. Mrfebruary (talk) 13:21, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

New Zealand Climate Science Coalition

Hi MrFebruary. I just had a quick suggestion re: your edits to the New Zealand Climate Science Coalition article. Do you know if the various controversies that they're stirred up have resulted in press coverage? The article would be stronger if independent sources were used to document their various scrapes and capers. The danger in using their own press releases is that the article starts to look like a vanity page for them. Media (and other) reports on their activities makes it much easier to justify their notability, should that be called into question. Of course, I'm assuming here that they do have some degree of impact - it may well be the case that they're (rightly) judged as cranks and ignored! Cheers, --PLUMBAGO 13:57, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Plumbago. Good point. Not many of their press releases get much mainstream media coverage. Let me think about that. One way of reflecting a lower level of notability may be to summarise the topics of their various releases. Mrfebruary (talk) 02:29, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I did some searching within NZ's main media www.stuff.co.nz, http://www.odt.co.nz/ and http://www.nzherald.co.nz/. and via Google

The allegations the NZCSC made against David Parker (politician), Peter Gluckman and the Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment appear to not receive any media coverage. So I have deleted the three allegations. Mrfebruary (talk) 08:04, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quickstats

In an edit to Fox Glacier you replaced template:NZ Quickstats with a template:Cite web using the same url. I implemented the former template as a protection against the statistics department changing its urls as they have done before. So long as the identifier for a statistical area remains the same, any change in url format can be dealt with by a trivial change to the template. Hard coding the urls potentially means a lot of work should the urls change.

I suggest you consider adding additional formatting to the template instead of replacing it.-gadfium 08:11, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know what template:NZ Quickstats is about. I didn't know that. I will revisit that edit. Mrfebruary (talk) 11:59, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Crafarms article

Hi MrFebruary, I have noticed you have made substantial contributions to the Crafarms Wikipedia article. From the history it looks as though you have written the entire article and based it almost entirely on how the media has portrayed the events surrounding the Crafar's. I was an employee of the Crafar group for 15 years and have tried to correct some of your misleading information and add some factual information based on first hand experience. I would appreciate it if you would allow my voice to be heard as the media has done a very poor and innacurate job of reporting about this family, giving very good people a very bad name. I'm sure if you took the time to get to know these people and investigate the real facts behind these cases you would change your tune. Also, I'm sure that if it was your family involved you would show a little more compassion. As I have no desire to stir up political, media and legal trouble, I have omitted several very relevant facts which have not been reported in the media at all as I know certain government organisations are trying hard to cover up the mess they made and are pretty happy to let the Crafar's take the fall for it. Hence the reason I deleted the animal welfare section entirely rather than rewording it with facts. I hope you appreciate my discression as I will surely appreciate yours.

Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Liteworker (talk • contribs) 06:47, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Global Warming Potential article

MrFebruary,

Under "Values" of the GWP article, there is this paragraph:

"Although water vapour has a significant influence with regard to absorbing infrared radiation (which is the green house effect; see greenhouse gas), its GWP is not calculated. Its concentration in the atmosphere mainly depends on air temperature. There is no possibility to directly influence atmospheric water vapour concentration." (emphasis added)

For anyone who as lived in the American Southwest, this last sentence will sound odd, and indeed, will not make sense. In Phoenix and Tucson, the introduction of irrigation (and swimming pools) in those cities have decreased the effectiveness of swamp coolers to the point that air-conditioning ("refrigeration" being the local term) has become necessary. Also, the local pollen count has increased significantly, because of the gardening and introduced species by home-owners. At one time, folks with allergies were told to move to the desert areas. This no longer works, unless they live outside of the cities.

Bseegmiller (talk) 21:59, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that interesting information about life in the American Southwest. Mrfebruary (talk) 23:08, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hydraulic fracturing in New Zealand

I note that you have made an edit to the Hydraulic fracturing in the United States article. Should we start a Hydraulic fracturing in New Zealand article? It has featured in The Press on a number of occasions. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 18:29, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Alan, I am in two minds. Thats quite a good idea. Or we could just 'grow' the NZ section of the Hydraulic fracturing until it makes sense to start a NZ -specific change. Sorry, not very decisive tonight! I'm a bit distracted reading the NZETS review report 2011. Mrfebruary (talk) 07:09, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 19

Hi. When you recently edited Escarpment Mine Project, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Department of Conservation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your Edits on 2012 United Nations Climate Change Conference

I have reinstated your deletion of over 3,000 bytes of content which is notable and strenghtens the article. Please don't note such deletions as minor, the removals you made were significant and it's much harder to catch such deletions when labeled minor. Please come to the article talk page if you want to discuss improvements to the article.Justanonymous (talk) 14:36, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kyoto Protocol Bias in Lede

I have removed your clarification needed citation, I have eight sources backing the statement. Listed here for your convenient reference:

Might I remind the esteemed editor that s/he is editing unilaterally as well. If you want to contribute, why not add a section on the 15% in the body and start to provide substance with the multiple sources that I have provided. I removed the clarification needed because there are 7 sources that I have listed plus the source cited. Mrfebruary has provided zero support for his statement. As such, I will remove the clarification needed because it is not and if we deem to need it we can add it in the body where it belongs and not in the lede where it does not. If you have 20 sources out there that show disagreement by all means please add them, otherwise, please stop vandalizing the page.

I'm not interested in an edit war, you can have the last word if you wish. I'm getting tired of the POV wrangling going on and with eight sources, I would think that should be enough for even the most cautious of reasonable editors.

Can we be sensible? Very willing to work with you. Help me understand if you have 20 sources out there that disagree.Justanonymous (talk) 23:42, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I do mean it sincerely, I will not block if you want a clarification back or if you decide to remove the 15%. I will trust your good faith, and I value your contributions. Justanonymous (talk)

Solid Energy

We need to do something about the promotional nature of Natures Flame in the Solid Energy article. I had a look at it and could not figure out how to proceed. Cheers. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 01:56, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ecan-backlog-jan-08.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ecan-backlog-jan-08.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:53, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ecan-logo.gif listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ecan-logo.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 19:57, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edits

Hi there. Thanks for all your work editing Wikipedia. You're amazing! I just wanted to mention one thing I noticed about your Wikipedia editing however. You seem to mark almost all of your edits to the New Zealand ETS article as "minor", even though some of them add quite a significant amount of detail to the article, or substantially change its meaning. I suggest – in the most gentle of ways – that you take a look at (or re-read) WP:MINOR, and perhaps start marking your substantive edits as non-minor. Cheers — Ballofstring (talk) 06:05, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Burnside High School

Hello! I am working on the russian version "Burnside High School" article, which currently has short history section in wikipedia. I am writing you to ask - is there a possibility for you to visit a National Library at Welligton and obtain an electronic copy of book "Choosing the right path : Burnside High School 1960-2010 / Paul O'Connor" (http://natlib.govt.nz/records/21643829), and put some information into the article? Also I can buy a hard copy of that book. Could you give me an advice, if it's possible? I'll be happy to get any version and any part of that book. Thank you for your time, --Voyagerim (talk) 13:27, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edit-a-thon in Wellington, May 29

Hi there. I'm organising an edit-a-thon at Te Papa on Sunday May 29th, focussed on adding NZ flora and fauna species to Wikipedia. It would be good to have some more experienced editors along to help any complete beginners, and I wonder if you might be interested in attending. If so, feel free to add yourself to the Wikipedia:Meetup/Wellington/2016_Edit-a-thon. It would be great to have a good turnout and show Te Papa there's an active local editing community. Giantflightlessbirds (talk) 22:39, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Mrfebruary. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

New Challenge for Oceania and Australia

Hi, Wikipedia:WikiProject Oceania/The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/The 5000 Challenge are up and running based on Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge which has currently produced over 2300 article improvements and creations. The Australia challenge would feed into the wider region one and potentially New Zealand could have a smaller challenge too. The main goal is content improvement, tackling stale old stubs and important content and improving sourcing/making more consistent but new articles are also welcome if sourced. I understand that this is a big goal for regular editors, especially being summertime where you are, but if you'd like to see large scale quality improvements happening for Oceania and Australia like The Africa Destubathon, which has produced over 1700 articles in 5 weeks, sign up on the page. The idea will be an ongoing national editathon/challenge for the region but fuelled by a series of contests to really get articles on every province and subject mass improved. The Africa contest scaled worldwide would naturally provide great benefits to Oceania countries, particularly Australia and attract new editors. I would like some support from existing editors here to get the Challenges off to a start with some articles to make doing a Destubathon worthwhile and potentially bring about hundreds of improvements in a few weeks through a contest! Cheers.♦ --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:12, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Mrfebruary. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mrfebruary. Excellent info, much appreciated. We are a group of programmers and like minded individuals looking into block chain technology for the Carbon markets. Can we collaborate on this?BR4000 (talk) 00:39, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Mrfebruary. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Cpwmap.png

The file File:Cpwmap.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:BacklogC-15-11-07.png

The file File:BacklogC-15-11-07.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

orphaned image, no information on an encyclopedic use, no information about source of data

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jordan 1972 (talk) 18:54, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rodney Power Station for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rodney Power Station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rodney Power Station until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

--IdiotSavant (talk) 01:38, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Request for applications for position of Wikipedian-at-Large, Aotearoa New Zealand

Kia ora! The Wikimedia Aotearoa New Zealand User Group invites you to read about the call for applications for a Wikipedian-at-Large for Aotearoa New Zealand in 2024. Group members are happy to explain the process and discuss ideas with interested editors.

Sent by Zippybonzo on behalf of MurielMary using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 06:37, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to an in-person meetup in Mohua / Golden Bay

Thinking about your summer break? Think about joining other Wikipedians and Wikimedians in Golden Bay / Mohua! Details are on the meetup page. There's heaps of interesting stuff to work on e.g. the oldest extant waka or New Zealand's oldest ongoing legal case. Or you may spend your time taking photos and then upload them.

Golden Bay is hard to get to and the airline flying into Tākaka uses small planes, so we are holding some seats from and to Wellington and we are offering attendees a $200 travel subsidy to help with costs.

Be in touch with Schwede66 if this event interests you and you'd like to discuss logistics. Schwede 66 09:14, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[isbn0-00-729846-3-1] Collins English Dictionary: 30th Anniversary Edition. London: Collins. 2009. ISBN 0-00-729846-3.

[isbn0-19-920687-2-2] Brown, Lesley; Stevenson, Angus (2007). Shorter Oxford English dictionary on historical principles (sixth ed.). Oxford [Oxfordshire]: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-920687-2.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)

[1]

[2]