User talk:Mrblueskys

Welcome!

Hello, Mrblueskys, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to The Breakfast Club. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Grandmaster Huon (talk) 06:14, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Grandmaster Huon! I'm excited to be here! Mrblueskys (talk) 20:02, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to complementary and alternative medicine, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template. — SamX [talk · contribs] 20:09, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mrblueskys, I'm SamX. Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently made additions to one or more articles such as Naturopathy without citing a reliable source. Please note that all content and edits on Wikipedia are expected to be verifiable in reliable sources. In articles related to medical topics, the standard for content and sourcing is defined at WP:MEDRS, and in your edit you did not include any references that meet that ideal. Please have a look at MEDRS to learn about the quality standards for medical sourcing. You might also want to take a look at WikiProject Medicine. If you have any questions related to sourcing of medical issues, you can ask at the WikiProject Medicine Talk page. For general questions about sourcing, see Wikipedia:Reliable sources. — SamX [talk · contribs] 20:09, 26 August 2023 (UTC) — SamX [talk · contribs] 20:09, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SamX, I appreciate your concern on the credibility of these sources; however, I included two secondary sources that are perfectly valid. One is from WebMD a credible medical news source, and the other is from the Australian Department of Health. Thanks. Mrblueskys (talk) 20:26, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]