User talk:Mrbean1000

It wont let me edit on Transformers revenge of the fallen page Can anbody help. :)

Speed of transformation

What is your source for the speed of Transformation? Please cite it or I'll have to remove it. Mathewignash (talk) 22:40, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Grindor/Blackout vandalism

Please cease your fan theories about Grindor being blackout, or I'll have to report you for vandalism. Mathewignash (talk) 12:57, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry :)

You've added Blackout again into the Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen article, and thus I have now started actions to have you blocked from the article and possibly related ones. --uKER (talk) 19:16, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Do not add again any unsourced information, especially regarding Blackout.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Mathewignash (talk) 20:57, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User page mirroring Transformers: RotF article

Hi. May I inquire the reason why your user page is a mirror of the Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen article? --uKER (talk) 15:48, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure I just felt like doing it lol :)

Moreover it's a mirror of his version of the page. How pathetic. Mathewignash (talk) 18:31, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mathewignash (talk) 11:19, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks for the advise.

Hi, deleting other people's talk is considered very rude, if you disagree, plese say so, don't delete their talk.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:37, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

blocked

blocked again, this time for a week.

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. Academic Challenger (talk) 05:37, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for saying Grindor is Blackout before. Stop now. This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Mathewignash (talk) 20:22, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

You returned to make exactly the same edits as had triggered the above sanction. Since you are not persuaded to discuss your contributions by finite period blocks, I have suspended your editing privileges indefinitely. LessHeard vanU (talk) 22:11, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Mrbean1000 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

77.86.82.83 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Disruptive editing: Resuming, without discussion, the edits that triggered the last block

Blocking administrator: LessHeard vanU (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: You have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock | your reason here}} to the bottom of your talk page, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Spartaz ^Humbug! 22:00, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]