User talk:Mr manilow

Taliesin

What do you think you are doing by coming along and unilaterally deciding to move Taliesin to Taliesin (poet). The poet Taliesin is clearly the primary meaning as everything else bearing his name derives from him: would you move Homer to "Homer (poet)" to disambiguate between him and Homer Simpson etc? Taliesin is also a supremely important figure in Welsh tradition and is very widely-known elsewhere. It is not possible to revert your move without a page deletion but I will certainly be seeing to it that this is done so that the article's name can be restored. You might at least have had the courtesy to state your proposed move on the article's talk page and give people time to reply - I am sure I am not the only editor who feels this move is totally unjustified. Enaidmawr (talk) 21:37, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article has now been restored to its rightful place. Enaidmawr (talk) 22:22, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As you may see from your watchlist, I have reversed the move as it was controversial and ought to have been discussed in advance, using the steps outlined at Wikipedia:Requested moves. Regards, Bencherlite ^Talk 22:24, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Google is not the answer to everything, particularly trying to compare long-dead Welsh-language poets with modern Americans. Similarly the number of Wikipedia articles mentioning the studio isn't proof that the poet is not the most important usage of the word "Taliesin". Using "modern and current" references only isn't enough: see WP:BIAS, for example. The issue needs to be discussed before any more moves are made to see what consensus is on this point, and all I did was restore the status quo pending that discussion. Incidentally, the way you went about the move was flawed: you left Taliesin (disambiguation) alone and effectively did a "cut and paste" of the contents (not good for GDFL compliance). What should have happened was a move of the disambig page to Taliesin, but that would have needed administrator help because of the need to delete first, so providing another reason for why discussion was required in advance, so that an administrator could see consensus for the use of the tools. Regards, Bencherlite Talk 17:18, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have decided to take Bencherlite's advice (above and on his Talk page) and am now pursuing this move, more formally, as per protocol at Requested Moves and on the Taliesin Talk. If you are interested in this chat, or have something to say, you can chime in t/here. :) Mr manilow (talk) 19:20, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

For the moment I will only add this to Bencherlite's remarks. You say on my talk page "I am most curious (if not positively anxious) to hear why the poet Taliesin trumps all other concerns going by that name." Is it perhaps because HE IS TALIESIN and therefore every other usage ultimately derives from him? He's as central to Welsh culture as say Abraham Lincoln is in the States. Pursuing your logic I take it you'll have no objection at all if I move the article on him to Abraham Lincoln (US president) and rename Abraham Lincoln (disambiguation) to "Abraham Lincoln"? Enaidmawr (talk) 22:29, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

PS On a lighter note, what on earth have you done to your talk page's contents?

Are you not allowed to (or supposed to) remove them? I just thought..they're old and useless now. I like a cleaner site with fresh material. Is this frowned upon? Mr manilow (talk) 23:44, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's normal practice to respect other people's contributions to your talk page (apart from vandalism and unacceptable personal comments, obviously) and not delete them. If you really want them out of the way, but still available, you should create an archive (see Help:Archiving a talk page). Enaidmawr (talk) 23:55, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Mr manilow! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 49 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Nancy Horan - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 00:20, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]