User talk:Tkwanza

Welcome!

Hello, Mr Annael, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Mawio Macrosystem CO LTD, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Tea House, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Kolbasz (talk) 13:11, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mawio Macrosystem CO LTD

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mawio Macrosystem CO LTD, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Kolbasz (talk) 13:11, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Hello, Mr Annael. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 12:14, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Sportfan5000 (talk) 19:56, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your userpage has been deleted

The page User:Mr Annael has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the content of the page appeared to be purely promotion of something or someone, and was unlikely to be suitable for an article (or at best would need a fundamental rewrite). Wikipedia is not a medium for promotion of anything, whether a company, product, group, service, person, religious or political belief, or anything else. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. — ξ ^xplicit 06:43, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mwadui F.C.

Hello Mr Annael,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Mwadui F.C. for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Esquivalience (talk) 19:07, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Tanzania Tourism Destinations

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Tanzania Tourism Destinations requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.tanzaniatourism.com/en/places-to-go/category/national-parks. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. S Philbrick (Talk) 15:04, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Venus Technologies (T) Company Limited

Venus Technologies (T) Company Limited is a Tanzanian Company duly incorporated by full registration from Business Registration and Licensing Agency (BRELA) to carry on business activities in the field IT addressing the requirement of the Information Technology services providers, other information technology and computer service activities.

The company acknowledge the reality that Tanzania is one of the new entrants in the lower middle economy as it was announced by World Bank on July 1, 2020, the country has the fast growing population in East Africa with some challenges in accessing the advanced ICT for their production and consumptions. Venus Technologies (T) Company limited is viewing Tanzania and other East and central Africa countries as the reliable market for its services and products thus experiencing desirable economic growth that cannot be dispersed with demand for Information and communication technological needs. Mr Annael (talk) 15:57, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Venus Technologies (T) Company Limited

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Venus Technologies (T) Company Limited requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Fram (talk) 16:26, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Chama Cha Mapinduzi, you may be blocked from editing. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 03:30, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There have already changes of leadership on Chama cha Mapinduzi

Why are you keeping old information. When we try to modify them you return the old which are miss reading

I am an officer from Chama cha Mapinduzi. I am trying to give you some information about the party.

We have the following new information:-

1. Dkt. Samia Suluhu Hassan Mwenyekiti wa CCM

2. Dkt. Hussein Ali Mwinyi Makamu Mwenyekiti Zanzibar

3. Ndugu Abdulrahman Omar Kinana Makamu Mwenyekiti Bara

4. Ndugu Daniel Godfrey Chongolo Katibu Mkuu (Nafasi za Mwenyekiti)

5. Ndugu Anamringi A. MaCha Naibu Katibu Mkuu Bara (Nafasi za Mwenyekiti)

6. Ndugu Mohamed Said Mohamed Naibu Katibu Mkuu Zanzibar (Viti 15 – Zanzibar)

7. Dkt. Philip Isidor Mpango Makamu wa Rais wa Jamhuri ya Muungano wa Tanzania

8. Ndugu Kassim Majaliwa Majaliwa Waziri Mkuu

9. Ndugu Hemed Suleiman Abdullah Makamu wa Pili wa Rais wa Zanzibar

10. Ndugu Issa Haji Ussi Katibu wa NEC Organaizesheni (Nafasi za Mwenyekiti)

11. Ndugu Sofia Mjema Katibu wa NEC Itikadi na Uenezi (Nafasi za Mwenyekiti)

12. Ndugu Mbarouku Nassro Mbarouku Katibu wa NEC SUKI (Nafasi za Mwenyekiti)

13. Dkt. Frank George Haule Hawassi - Katibu wa NEC Uchumi na Fedha (Nafasi za Mwenyekiti)

14. Dkt. Tullia Ackson Spika wa Bunge

15. Ndugu Zubeir Ali Maulid Spika Baraza la Wawakilishi

16. Ndugu Mary Pius Chatanda

Mwenyekiti UWT

17. Ndugu Mohamed Ali Mohamed (Kawaida) Mwenyekiti UVCCM

18. Ndugu Fadhil Rajab Maganya Mwenyekiti WAZAZI

19. Ndugu Mizengo Kayanza Peter Pinda Mjumbe (Nafasi za Mwenyekiti) Tkwanza (talk) 03:48, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Content on wikipedia must be sourced using reliable third-party sources, you may never use yourself as a source. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 03:58, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your are keeping restoring the misleading why?

I told you I am an officer from Chama cha Mapinduzi.

The reliable source are from this link

https://ccm.or.tz/ccm-idara

Stop keeping misleading. Tkwanza (talk) 04:02, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Primary sources may not be used here. This is an encyclopedia, not som online directory for official party information! Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 04:05, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So where do you get the source your keeping restoring?

I am giving you the source from Tanzania. Your information is misleading. Tkwanza (talk) 04:06, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for promotion or advertising, as you did at Chama Cha Mapinduzi. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 04:06, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tkwanza (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand how to use Wikipedia about editing information. I will improve my editing capabilities.

Decline reason:

One open unblock request at a time, please; you abusively had two. I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 10:01, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tkwanza (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not a good eglish speaker. I understand the issue the issue of editing an article repeatedly. So I will not do it again. I will try to follow the instructions if Adminjstrators. Tkwanza (talk) 10:14, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I would suggest that you participate at the version of Wikipedia that is in your primary language. There is nothing special about the English Wikipedia, it's just a different language. 331dot (talk) 10:17, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tkwanza (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am trying my best to apologize. I want to ask my account will be unblocked or not. Because I don't know what exactly make me to get blocked. I am trying to understand and to apologize. Please Unblock my account.

Decline reason:

You are blocked for abusing multiple accounts. In your next unblock request, you should address this reason. PhilKnight (talk) 14:25, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

. Tkwanza (talk) 10:22, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tkwanza (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am blocked because of using multiple accounts. I understand now I will always use this Account. Please unblock me. Kind regards.

Decline reason:

I am concerned that, immediately prior to the sockpuppetry, you appeared to have repeatedly added poorly-sourced content and engaged in edit-warring to keep it in place. I do not think that lifting your unblock at this time would be a net-benefit to the encyclopedia. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 04:33, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Tkwanza (talk) 14:35, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tkwanza (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have studied and understand so from now I will behave. Thank you Tkwanza (talk) 15:09, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It's unclear to me if you are deliberately wasting our time or if you lack sufficient competence to write an appropriate unblock request. If the latter, please review WP:GAB and WP:CIR. It's unlikely you'll get more than one more unblock request, so make it count. Yamla (talk) 23:01, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.