User talk:MrPreamble
License tagging for File:Http---orig12.deviantart.net-6d83-f-2015-232-d-a-5846661 dalton confederate flag rally video goes v by oddgarfield-d96hu6v.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Http---orig12.deviantart.net-6d83-f-2015-232-d-a-5846661 dalton confederate flag rally video goes v by oddgarfield-d96hu6v.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.
To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:06, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
July 2020
[edit]
Hi MrPreamble! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Woodroar (talk) 22:53, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
- I have reviewed this detail and taken it into account, the edit was in the talk section and not on the article itself and therefore couldn't be construed as fitting with this description of "Minor edit" as you so put it, although this is judging purely from your description here and not the link. Thank you. MrPreamble (talk) 00:24, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
- I left the note precisely because it was on a Talk page—"Adding comments to a talk page or other discussion" is in the "What not to mark as minor changes" section at Help:Minor edit—but also because the majority of your edits since April 2019 have been marked as minor. I'm guessing the box was checked at some point and stayed checked. It happens, I get that. Woodroar (talk) 23:19, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
- I have reviewed this detail and taken it into account, the edit was in the talk section and not on the article itself and therefore couldn't be construed as fitting with this description of "Minor edit" as you so put it, although this is judging purely from your description here and not the link. Thank you. MrPreamble (talk) 00:24, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
Discretionary sanctions alert
[edit]
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
O3000 (talk) 11:54, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.