User talk:MrDarcy/Archive1

Back to current talk page ● To my user page

Thanks

My impersonator won't be back for 31 hours. Thanks for the heads up. alphaChimp ^laudare 04:24, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What's a popup?

did you accuse me of using a popup? I didn't post any pictures with mouseovers? did i?

please clarify Guerillafilm 18:08, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about personal attacks

So, do I erase the statement against dposse? What should I do? I'm new around here... Sorry. I'll do whatever is necessary to fix the problem. Otherwise, I take the consequences like a man.

Thanks for the advice. I won't engage in any more personal attacks. Incidentally I'm only 16 years old. Am I allowed to edit wiki or am I too young? Sorry for losing my temper. In the future, if there is a conflict, can I ask you for advice? I like Snakes on a Plane. but that doesn't mean that I feel comfortable lying about it. dposse kept deleting my contributions even when I properly used citations. he told me that he wants to make a cool Snakes on a Plane page. he seems to object to any effort to make a neutral sounding page. he keeps editing out/deleting anything negative about the film. I'm not trashing the movie. like i said, I like the movie. I just want to report all the facts about the movie. alot of people in the industry were really disappointed about the film. the movie was projected by industry analysts to make 30 million at least and it only made 18 million! and alot of people in the industry are highly critical/disappointed about the outcome of this film. I simply wanted to report those facts since they are part of the history surrounding this film. but dposse deletes anything negative about the movie and then tries to twist my sources and contributions into making it sound like the movie is doing well. I don't want to be like bill o'reilly and spin disappointing truths about life into positive sounding spins/lies. anyhow, I'm sorry for my behavior. could you help me if future conflicts like this happen? i think I'm too young to figure out all these rules and effectively deal with manipulation and trolling from guys like dposse that are trying hard to hijack wiki pages for their own purposes.

thanks for your advice. and, again, I'm sorry. I will try to spend tonight reading these rules so I can learn further

thanks Guerillafilm 02:39, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

So much for fairness...

I find it interesting that when other users attack me and make unnecessary personal attacks, then nobody comes to my defense. But when I lose my temper and screw up then everyone (especially you) is on my case. I'm not justifying my own behavior. And I'm trying to make amend. But clearly chocolateboy is using me as a scapegoat for what he doesn't like about this edit dispute and he won't stop personal attacks. And I'm too inexperienced at Wiki to know what to do to stop it.. It would be nice if experienced users like yourself didn't single only me and dposse out when clearly other users on that forum are using their experience on Wiki as a baseball bat across the knees of people like me starting out. So much for the spirit of fairness. Good day. Guerillafilm 19:38, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Alpha Phi Alpha vandal

An admin placed a semi protect on the Alpha Phi Alpha page so that new or anonymous users could not edit the page. The sockpuppet vandal immediately created user ID NinjaNubian and requested the page be unprotected. He has begun vandalzing the page again. I have sent several request to stop chaning the work of others, and just sent him the first warning level. Can you pls monitor and block his ID if he persist. You can review his talk page to see that other contributors have complained to him about vandalizing other pages. thanks for you help. Ccson 13:25, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The same user is vandalizing the article again. He insists on changing words and sentences that promote his own POV. These words and sentences have survived a peer review and Featured Article review. Please review and ask him to stop changing the work of other editors. Ccson 06:12, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

USU True Aggie Tradition

Dear MrDarcy,

Don't worry I will take care of this article. It will be cleaned up and encyclopedic soon.

True Aggie Tradition at Utah State University

SuperCow 04:24, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Image:Thermometer.jpg

Your image is a good one for illustrating cold temperatures. Any chance you could make a correlary which illustrates hot temperatures (maybe with red inside)? It would be much appreciated, as I am no good with images and I need something to illustrate high temperatures for a template I'm editing.-Runningonbrains 22:04, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

NinjaNubian/MyKungfu

Has reported you, me, and others to Wikipedia: Suspected sock puppets I have added harrassment and illegal behavior to the RfC page, regarding this user. http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/NinjaNubian#Harrassment_and_Illegal_Behaviour_by_accused_user --- Bearly541 06:07, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also, could you please protect my userpage? I am currently busy with other ventures and will not have time to edit on Wikipedia until early next year. Thank you. Bearly541 06:07, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Can you remove the sockpuppet thing from page also. I'm not Bearly541 or any of the other IDs i'm accused on using. I only use my ID.Ccson 14:30, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It is still up... http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Suspected_sock_puppets/MrDarcy when it goes down or closed then you can remove it.. Mykungfu 19:09, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

why not look at hte case that is up against you. Mykungfu 19:36, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

huh? why are you pretending there are cases against other people, when you are the one getting blocked?

		Order of the Flaming Hellpot
		I, Robotam, award MrDarcy the Order of the Flaming Hellpot for being the victim of an egregious and malicious vandal, whom he will soon send tumbling into the pits of the abyss.

BTW - not that this is a surprise, but the CheckUser came back definitively negative on you and Ccson (ie unlike Mykungfu's, you are definitely not Ccson). Feel free to revert any blather from MKF on sight regarding this issue. Syrthiss 11:50, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I've been removing them when I see them at 3rr, as has William Connolly and a few other admins. Even if we hadn't already declined to block, we'd never block 5 days after the fact. I'd say just ignore it, and on the slim chance that he manages to fool an admin into blocking you for it email me from the link on my userpage and I'll unblock right away. Syrthiss 17:30, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You may assume good faith, however; please take a look at the Alpha Kappa Alpha article and talk pages. Since I have begun editing this article and Omega Psi Phi, he's jumped right in there with his same MO, summarily removing text, sources and the like that he doesn't approve of. He's saying on AKA that no text is allowed unless it from an official fraternity website; that should assure a NPOV. The Alpha Kappa Alpha artilce had 4 footnotes, now it only has 1 because he's removing the text. He follows me around on wikipedia, so you can expect a reply from hin in few hours if not minutes. Ccson 03:12, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Aren't they all?

shan wells article-

hi- looking to discuss the shan wells article. The article has been revised to fit notability requirements. Please advise why this is in dispute. Please view entry of Andrew Drummond for comparison.

thank you

Subject of your attention - StrangeApples

http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Suspected_sock_puppets/Mykungfu_%282nd%29

i've seen it. it's a nice reading... i disagree and unlike this user mykungfu, i speak about things and am aware of what's going on because I READ talk pages! i also confer with Admin concerning things unlike the user mykungfu http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User_talk:Syrthiss#Kappa_Alpha_Psi . My contribution list is far broader than MyKungFu. anyway it's been an honor to be the subject of your interests. I feel like a star with Paparazzi! StrangeApples 05:01, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Thanks for your help

No problem, happy to help. I was confused the first time I wrote one too. I think filing a 3RR vio is the most confusing, though. >_< --Koji Dude ^{(viva la} ^BAM!) 00:23, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Terroristic Accusations

because NinjaNubian/MyKungfu is using multiple IPs to endorse keep for article and terrorising Alpha Phi Alpha and Alpha Kappa Alpha.

http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk%3AArticles_for_deletion%2FAlpha_Kappa_Nu_%28second_nomination%29&diff=79079725&oldid=79079037

Well Mr. Darcy, at least you tried to reason with him/her, even if to no avail.[1]...-Robotam 12:52, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is a personal attack. I kept the position, but removed the accusation. This is per Wiki Rules. Rather than file a RFC, i'm contacting you concerning this. Mykungfu 18:15, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regardless of whether we have issues on this website, making a terroristic threat or claiming someone is in this day and age will cause more harm than might have been originally intended. That can be akin to be past the level of racial epithats. Mykungfu 18:26, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for calling MyKungfu a terrorist. However, in future edits, TAKE THE DISPUTE to the discussion page before making unwarranted edits. If not, it is highly likely that administrative action will be taken. I don't want for another user to destroy or harm my hard edits (which I researched) or other users' edits (like Ccson) without warrant like you have and without discussing why making the changes first on the discussion page. Bearly541 03:37, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey bearly, how about you and mykungfu sit down over some fried chicken and go over invictus or recite excuses. then you may find a common bond. 150.210.226.6 22:40, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Mykungfu! How about you quit making warrantless edits or you will be banned? Your progress is shown here: http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Category:Suspected_Wikipedia_sockpuppets_of_Mykungfu --Bearly541 00:59, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Skip Mason

Honestly, I feel his contributions are quite biased. He is a proud alpha yes, his contributions are better reserved for the Alpha Phi Alpha page. Many of his points are personal opinion though somethings can be verified. Something like this "Historian and Alpha archivist Herman Mason has stated, "As a historian who recognizes that laying a foundation for any period of history, I find their omission inexcusable and without merit." http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Alpha_Phi_Alpha#The_first_black_fraternity.3F

I find to be simply unencyclopedic in nature. Mykungfu 19:50, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re:

You left this note on my talk page: However, in future edits, TAKE THE DISPUTE to the discussion page before making unwarranted edits. If not, it is highly likely that administrative action will be taken. I don't want for another user to destroy or harm my hard edits (which I researched) or other users' edits (like Ccson) without warrant like you have and without discussing why making the changes first on the discussion page. Exactly what the hell are you talking about? I haven't made any edits to those pages other than reverting the vandalism. | Mr. Darcy talk 14:03, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was talking about Mykungfu, not you! Goodness! But I like this line...

Exactly what the hell are you talking about?

---Bearly541 00:21, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My friend, you need a WP:Wikibreak. Bearly541 00:34, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Alpha Kappa Alpha

Thanks. I'm glad it was protected in its pre-vandal state. I've tried to reason with User:Mykungfu on his talk page, but I'm holding firm that there will be no discussion until the vandalism stops. Incidentally, are you a Met fan? | Mr. Darcy talk 01:48, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I am :-) —Mets501 (talk) 01:50, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ready to work together?

Since this whole lil' reporting each other is really non constructive and time consuming. You can make a page and we can go over things one by one. Easy enough? 205.188.117.69 14:34, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes? No? 64.12.116.9 18:45, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Read WP:POINT. We have nothing to discuss. You have shown no respect for me or for Wikipedia. You're a vandal and you only care about getting your way. | Mr. Darcy talk 19:25, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]