User talk:Mr3abd

July 2015

Hello, I'm Leoesb1032. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Reform and Renaissance Party because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Leoesb1032 (talk) 15:34, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 27 July

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Reform and Renaissance Party page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:27, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Reform and Renaissance Party has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Reform and Renaissance Party was changed by Mr3abd (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.873433 on 2015-08-13T04:06:18+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:06, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Mr3abd. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Reform and Renaissance Party, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Nick⁠—⁠^Contact/_Contribs 05:22, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]