User talk:Mpaulson (WMF)

WikiWomen's Luncheon at Wikimania 2012

WikiWomen's Luncheon at Wikimania - You are invited!

Are you a woman attending Wikimania 2012? If so, join us on Saturday, July 14, for the annual WikiWomen's Luncheon (fka WikiChix Lunch) This event is for any women attending Wikimania. Pick up your lunch, compliments of Wikimania, and join us at 1:30pm in the Grand Ballroom for a lively facilitated discussion hosted by Sue Gardner. We look forward to seeing you there. Please sign up here.
Sarah (talk) 16:14, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas!

TheGeneralUser (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Hello Mpaulson! Wishing you a very Happy Merry Christmas :) TheGeneralUser (talk) 00:09, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Is this accurate?

http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AJimbo_Wales&action=historysubmit&diff=555245020&oldid=555239607 — Preceding unsigned comment added by InconvenientCritic (talk • contribs) 19:33, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi InconvenientCritic! I believe we provided some initial background research on Section 2257, but I do not think we advised anyone that Commons users did not need to maintain Section 2257 documentation...in part because the law is not settled on the matter and in part because the Foundation's legal team is not permitted to give legal advice to the community due to U.S. legal ethics regulations. I do hope, however, that the initial research is helpful. Mpaulson (WMF)

Thanks for the quick response. That link you provided is a red link with nothing behind it. Do you have a link to the initial background research you conducted?InconvenientCritic (talk) 18:34, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that! Not sure why that didn't work. Here is the whole link: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Legal_and_Community_Advocacy/Age_Record_Requirement Mpaulson (WMF)

Thank you. You're a peach.InconvenientCritic (talk) 19:09, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Link fixed (like this). Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:57, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Terms of Use notice

Please review MediaWiki_talk:Wikimedia-copyrightwarning#Protected_edit_request_on_9_September_2016 and let me know if it is OK to enact this change. — xaosflux ^Talk 02:47, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mpaulson (WMF). Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

— xaosflux ^Talk 02:51, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Star Athletica v Varsity Brands bot

Hi Michelle, could you (or someone from your team) look into the legal ramifications of Star Athletica v Varsity Brands and tell us if this bot proposal is a good idea? Its task is outlined in the "function details" section of the proposal. Thanks. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 22:54, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Save vs Publish in copyright warning

Please see MediaWiki_talk:Wikimedia-copyrightwarning#Protected_edit_request_on_18_December_2017. Thank you, — xaosflux ^Talk 03:33, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]