User talk:Mountainmover55
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/2f/Culinary_fruits_front_view.jpg/300px-Culinary_fruits_front_view.jpg)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/79/Face-smile.svg/25px-Face-smile.svg.png)
Hello, Mountainmover55, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.
- Please sign your name on talk pages, by using four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically produce your username and the date, and helps to identify who said what and when. Please do not sign any edit that is not on a talk page.
- Check out some of these pages:
- Introduction to Wikipedia | Tutorial
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- The five pillars of Wikipedia | Cheatsheet of WikiCode
- If you have a question that is not one of the frequently asked questions below, check out Wikipedia:Questions, stop by and/or ask a question at the Teahouse, ask me on my talk page, or click the button below. Happy editing and again, welcome! Happy Squirrel (talk) 01:14, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
- Do a search on Google or your preferred search engine for the subject of the Wikipedia article that you want to create a citation for.
- Find a website that supports the claim you are trying to find a citation for.
- In a new tab/window, go to the citation generator, click on the 'An arbitrary website' bubble, and fill out as many fields as you can about the website you just found.
- Click the 'Get reference wiki text' button.
- Highlight, and then copy (Ctrl+C or Apple+C), the resulting text (it will be something like
<ref> {{cite web | .... }}</ref>
, copy the whole thing). - In the Wikipedia article, after the claim you found a citation for, paste (Ctrl+V or Apple+V) the text you copied.
- If the article does not have a References or Notes section (or the like), add this to the bottom of the page, but above the External Links section and the categories:
==References== {{Reflist}}
Happy Squirrel (talk) 01:14, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
Some suggestions
[edit]NiCl2(dppp) adopts both sq planar and (a tiny bit is my guess) of the tetrahedral geometry. The former is diamagnetic. The sq planar form does the Kumada chem. So it is helpful to acknowledge the geometric equilibrium, but most of the action is with the sq planar form. The orange color is also consistent with closed shell. You might check, but the chlorides tend to favor the planar geometry in this series of Ni(II) complexes. So I wonder if the planar depiction should be shown still.--Smokefoot (talk) 21:40, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
In the reference I placed in the article, the authors observe that dpppNiX2 (Cl, Br, I) is in a rapid equilibrium between tetrahedral and square-planar in solution (Keq = 1-3, which is not a tiny bit, but a 50:50 to 75:25 mixture, which is quite significant). Even in the solid state (which has the red-orange color) they observe a magnetic moment for dpppNiCl2, indicating the solid state structure is a mixture of square-planar and tetrahedral forms. I agree that the square-planar geometry would produce a diamagnetic complex though. As to what geometry "does the Kumada chem" as you say, once the dichloride precatalyst reacts with a Grignard or zinc or boron reagent, it reduces down to dpppNi(0), which then can undergo oxidative addition, transmetallation, etc etc. While I don't disagree that (dppp)Ni(R)X or (dppp)NiR2 would be planar and diamagnetic (many examples of those isolated complexes), but its very difficult to establish which geometry of the precatalyst reacts the organometallic reagent in the cross-coupling. I would argue that the tetrahedral form would react faster with a Grignard or zinc reagent, as the p-orbital electrons on chloride have less overlap with metal d-orbitals in a tetrahedral geometry than in the square-planar form, allowing them to more favorably interact with Mg, Zn, etc. and allow for more rapid transmetallation. But this is just a theory, and is not supported by experiments. Therefore, I think it is important to make readers aware of the equilibrium between the square-planar and tetrahedral geometries in the article for this very useful precatalyst. I tried to upload an image similar to the one in the article for (PPh3)2NiCl2, but wikipedia will not allow me to upload it. If the equilibrium can't be shown, I think no image should be shown.--Mountainmover55 (talk) 10:27, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
Iron(III) chloride solutions
[edit]Hi Mountainmover55,
I saw your edit at iron(III) chloride. I'm not sure the previous version was a typo. Do you have a copy of Cotton to hand to check the original wording?
Greenwood & Earnshaw (second edition, pages 1088-1090) says solutions and salts containing [Fe(H2O)6]3+ are typically pale pink or pale violet if hydrolysis is avoided (e.g. by keeping the pH around zero). So the original text was not wrong.
They also note the hydrolytic processes are complicated but discuss it in detail for iron(III) perchlorate. There are equilibria between [Fe(H2O)6]3+ and the yellow charge-transfer species [Fe(H2O)5(OH)]2+, [Fe(H2O)4(OH)2]+, and the hydroxide-bridged dimer [Fe(H2O)4(OH)]24+. So it's not just chloride ligands in [FeCl2(H2O)4]+ and [FeCl4]− that could account for the yellow colour of aqueous iron(III) chloride.
Ben (talk) 20:12, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks Ben! Sorry, I think I understood the text as discussing Fe(II) (which was why I thought the original editor meant Mn(II)). My bad, thanks for catching this! Mountainmover55 (talk) 14:13, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
No problem, it was interesting to dig into this. I wasn't quite sure myself but had an inkling something subtle was going on. Ben (talk) 22:13, 7 June 2022 (UTC)