User talk:Mike1234554321

Welcome!

Hi MotifPublisher! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Iwilsonp (talk) 04:40, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Herbert Weiss (journalist) (May 1)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Sulfurboy was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Wikipedia has zero interest in helping publish someones press release. There is absolutely nothing neutral or formal about this. Considerable WP:NPOV and WP:NOTPRESSRELEASE issues that would require WP:TNT to fix. As such, this is rejected.

Sulfurboy (talk) 09:14, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MotifPublisher! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 09:14, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Herbert Weiss (journalist)

Hello, MotifPublisher. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Herbert Weiss (journalist), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:01, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Herbert Weiss (journalist)

Hello, MotifPublisher. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Herbert Weiss".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:28, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because your account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Also, your username gives the impression that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

If you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization, you may request unblock and a username change. In your reasons, you must:

Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement; and
Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked; and
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked; and
Provide a new username.

To do this, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken and in use by another account. You can go here to search and see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is available to be taken.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:15, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mike1234554321 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I seem to be accused of using this account for self promotion and of being paid for the wiki edits I submitted. Frankly, that's a little offensive. I'm familiar with the rules and am pretty sure I'm not breaking any of them. I'm not being paid, and the only updates I've ever made with this account are on behalf of a prolific elderly journalist who is just not good with tech. This last update that got me banned was for relocating a paragraph that was already published and updating the number of articles he's had published. While the name of the magazine where I work does appear in my user name (Motif - it's derived from my email address) and I will change usernames in the future, since this seems excessively problematic, nothing I've done is self-promotion -- I never even created a wikipedia page for the magazine, and certainly am not promoting it. Herb, the journalist whose info I updated, doesn't work here and hasn't had a submission in many years. I don't see the conflict in helping him out - he's just a nice guy who happens to hold wikipedia in high esteem. I would love some clarity/insight on why someone thinks I'm in error, and why I'm accused of being paid when I'm not. MotifPublisher (talk) 21:31, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action, or you have not responded to questions raised during that time. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 19:01, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please place new posts at the bottom; this may be easier to do by clicking "edit" and not "reply"(the reply feature is imperfect for several reasons, including making it harder to post something at the bottom). 331dot (talk) 08:59, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We can change your username right now if you tell us what you want to change it to. I just want to make sure I understand- you say you work for Motif, but that writing about this journalist was not part of your job duties and he himself did not compensate you for doing this? 331dot (talk) 09:03, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Correct on all points. I really don't care what the user name is. MotifPublisher (talk) 09:06, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We can't pick a name for you, you will need to tell us what you want. Even if you are not compensated by anyone, you still have a conflict of interest with regards to this journalist. We're going to want to see some edits unrelated to this conflict of interest before permitting you to further edit about him(if that's still your intention after four years).

The promotion claim comes from the content that was on your user page as well, "Motif is Rhode Island's arts and entertainment information resource, which includes Motif Magazine, a free print publication, motifri.com and a number of digital video channels and social media properties. The publisher from 2012 - present is Mike Ryan of Providence, RI." 331dot (talk) 09:33, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand the conflict. Are professional journalists not allowed to contribute to wikipedia? The information is accurate, I just don't understand why that would be a conflict.

Is there a way to find out what usernames are taken. I am fine with a randomly generated one, or mike1234567890987654321 or something like that. MotifPublisher (talk) 09:40, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may run a potential choice through Special:CentralAuth; if no results come up, the choice is available.

It's not your specific career that is the problem, since you say you aren't editing as part of your job and not editing about your employer. Articles are typically written by independent editors; they do so without permission from, or even the knowledge of, the subject in most cases. This helps to ensure a neutral point of view. You say you wrote your draft on behalf of the subject- that is a clear conflict of interest. The draft was only deleted due to inactivity and can be restored- but you will need to agree to submit the draft for a review when you feel it's ready and agree to formally disclose the conflict of interest as WP:COI instructs. If there are other topics you want to edit about, it would help to tell us those, too. 331dot (talk) 09:53, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ah. Yes, I do know the guy, and while I wrote it, I fact checked it with him. Never occurred to me that was a conflict. Thanks for explaining, and thanks for your time.

mike1234554321 seems to be available as a user name.

I don't expect to be submitting any other specific content any time soon. MotifPublisher (talk) 10:37, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Renamed. HJ Mitchell I would appreciate knowing any thoughts you have on this. Thanks 331dot (talk) 10:46, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]