User talk:Mosti95

September 2023

Care to explain your revert? Also, why did you ignore the discussion on the article's talk page? M.Bitton (talk) 12:23, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As you can see in the Source I provided, Numidia always consisted of eastern Morocco as well as Algeria and southern Tunisia. It corresponds roughly to the modern day Western Zenata Speakers.

The claim that was there before (Original=Algeria) is a political, not a historical or Scientific Statement. 2A02:3037:408:5435:3C54:33DC:2D49:66C2 (talk) 12:31, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for confirming that you have been socking using two IPs and this dormant account. Now, I suggest you start using the article's talk page where I have other questions for you. M.Bitton (talk) 12:36, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Numidia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. M.Bitton (talk) 12:28, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Numidia. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. M.Bitton (talk) 12:42, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Tariq ibn Ziyad. M.Bitton (talk) 09:44, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Tariq ibn Ziyad. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. M.Bitton (talk) 09:54, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Acroterion (talk) 10:35, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mosti95 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

There was a misunderstanding. I never intended to sock puppet. I added something, got the message that I should log in, logged in afterwards. Then someone claimed I edit warred and that I socked. Mosti95 (talk) 10:42, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural Decline - this request pertains to a previous expired block, not even to the latest expired block. Cabayi (talk) 09:17, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have modified this block to a 48 hour block for disruptive editing. You are editing articles that have seen a lot of recent contention and nationalist disruption. The articles may have to be protected if that continues. Acroterion (talk) 11:47, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Acroterion: Mosti95 is IP socking again (despite the block on their account and the the previous IPs that they used). M.Bitton (talk) 22:40, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Acroterion (talk) 23:20, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've extended the block for logged-out blockevasion and blocked the IP range. Acroterion (talk) 23:21, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

April 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. The Wordsmith^{Talk to me} 23:57, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @The Wordsmith

i don’t really understand why I got blocked suddenly. Could you please give me a explanation? Mosti95 (talk) 00:10, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]