User talk:Mosmos69

Rebecca Bardoux[edit]

Your recent editing history at Rebecca Bardoux shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 22:41, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Rebecca Bardoux, you may be blocked from editing. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 22:41, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please tell me where you are getting your information that she only did stand up only once because you are severely mistaken

Just ignore this. HW doesn't care nor does he want to put the effort into locating sources that back up the content. Just source it properly (and feel free to ask for help on the Talk page) and it should be fine. And don't forget to sign your posts with ~~~~... :) --Scalhotrod - Just your average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy... (Talk) ☮ღ☺ 20:14, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]