User talk:Moredecai

Welcome!

Hello, Moredecai, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! --☭🎆🌎🎼🎺🐦 22:15, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am trying to learn improprieties disambiguation. I only request that my edits be kept quiet and aforementioned.--Moredecai (talk) 22:04, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Moredecai was featured in [[[[<Article link>]]|a WikiProject Report]] in the Signpost on <Day> <Month> <Year>.

ear=<Year>}}

Isn't there a place for my namespace or Legal idealism? Game theory and its roles playing are always worthier of consideration. At Fox 40 news though it warrants research of the next Politico; i.e. President Elect and his resolve for neighboring producers. We all want to read; and have some voice in our countries policy. How can we make better due, of our enfranchisement, taxes, and duties? There is always stipends and the sequestration of His compound and of course Homeland security. I have a challenge for you; and the future is our children’s. Why is it an American? Filing is an privileged responsibility to espouse certain truths and contribute uniform efforts to the faith and wellness of generations to come. A body politic has it immediacy and agency to consecrate its fruit. I would like to have the attached article published amongst a aggregate reader in Really Simple Syndication. I hope that it can be read amongst thread of important local interest and the news. Can you see to it that I am introduced in your Network? America is falling behind. Hong Kong is a e-waste dumping ground for only importers. It is time for change. Often considered a disturbing thoughts Anglo’s provocation is an error. America is falling behind. The Sahara and those wealthy tycoons from Saudi Arabi have relegated us to poor thinking. The oil embargo like the smaller business venturing must be deregulated & competitive and also delist its un healthier oil barrel prices. It’s a verity that make for globalization an a free market economy. Here in Sacramento I am a witness to California waste and collective vote. The cars are under regulated and make for a fright and un attractive scares. The truth of the matter Sacramento Valley is no longer our parents well and good water. Hong Kong is a e-waste dumping ground for only importers. It is time for change.

Signpost WikiProject Desk

Greetings, Please discuss your edits on the Talk page before making the change. Some of these updates, for example the Schedule wikitable is not right, causing the table to display incorrectly. If you need help with learning Wikipedia updates, a good place for new editors to ask questions is at the Teahouse. Regards, — JoeHebda • (talk) 20:56, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to WikiProject desk / Call for interviews page

The Signpost, WikiProject desk, Call for interviews page is not to be signed. After that page's wikicode is posted onto another WikiProject's talk page, it can be signed there by the WikiProject's members who are volunteering to be interviewed. Please stop signing this page. If you have any ideas of how to clarify that page, let's discuss. Cheers! — JoeHebda • (talk) 18:48, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain to me why you continue signing this template? (At WikiProject desk/Call for interviews)

17:14, 7 June 2016‎ Moredecai (talk | contribs)‎ . . (1,628 bytes) (+84)‎ . . (→‎From the WikiProject desk at The Signpost)

That page is a "blank" template & is to be used only for posting at other WikiProjects where an interview is about to take place. If you continue, I will request page protection so it cannot be changed. Regards, — JoeHebda • (talk) 23:11, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Newsroom/WikiProject desk/WP

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Newsroom/WikiProject desk/WP, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (proclaim) 23:55, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate that you enjoy using Wikipedia, please note that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a social network. Wikipedia is not a place to socialize or do things that are not directly related to improving the encyclopedia. Off-topic material may be deleted at any time. We're sorry if this message has discouraged you from editing here, but the ultimate goal of this website is to build an encyclopedia (please see What Wikipedia is not for further details). Thank you. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:25, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:31, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've blocked you because from what I can see, your main/sole purpose here is to use Wikipedia as a WP:SOAPBOX for your personal viewpoints and opinions, which is WP:NOT what Wikipedia is for. You might be able to be unblocked, but you would need to show the following:

That you understand that Wikipedia is not a blog or other place to post your own original thoughts.
Identify how you will edit Wikipedia if you are unblocked and give examples of what you would edit and how you identify reliable sources and appropriate topics.

If you can do this then you might be unblocked. However I note that you've created several blog-type entries and various other cut/pastes of other pages. Edits like this one where you remove another person's content is also considered to be inappropriate. I have to admit that I'm concerned that you're only here to promote your viewpoints. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:33, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Is this of poor opinion and rather not poor competence I am still needful in learning. I was going to propose and edit to Eduardo my Adoptive Wikipedian account as MetlifeWP so as to learn what I am doing wrong. I intend to leave him my suggestion and then proposal as for my signpost edit. I am unsure of the proper way to interview and construct questions which will give my story substantiation and support. Once again I have the opinion I am be vandalized. The assigned Talk says so with a special formatting in dark blue. If this is correcting please feel you have my approval. --Moredecai (talk) 17:20, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You aren't naturally bias but ridiculous because I have 64 edits in my preferences log and only 3 were done less properly. What is your intention? I have to admit that I'm concerned that you're only here to promote your viewpoints. I say I have a great detail of hard work invested in WP and I can't learn a thing with your stupid principals. I am looking for a career and I know for sure I can write! --Moredecai (talk) 19:02, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Out of the various edits you made, over half of them were so problematic that they warranted speedy deletion. That's more than three edits and I also note that at least one person contacted you to ask about your edits, which you seem to have ignored. While we do try to take new user status into account, after a certain point (usually after warnings are posted and/or edits are reverted or deleted) we have to assume that the poster is deliberately ignoring requests and warnings in order to suit their own purpose for being here. Now you say that you were going to ask to have the MetlifeWP account be adopted, however I note that this account was blocked last year for the same reasons. The account PCruiser was blocked for the same reasons only a few months ago. With this in mind I have to assume that you have learned nothing and will likely continue to resist any attempts by others to get you to learn policy and procedure. That you've blanked the page to continue to cut/paste content from the Signpost confirms this and that's why I'm going to block your access to your talk page.

I'll be very blunt: Wikipedia is not a place to post your personal musings and the Signpost is not going to host this content either, as they really only write about things that directly pertain to Wikipedia. They're not a place that will post personal opinions and theories about general topics and they're even less likely to post content that was created by someone that has repeatedly attempted to evade a block to use Wikipedia as a soapbox for their viewpoints.

If you want to be unblocked you must do this under the original account MetlifeWP, however at this point I would say that the chances of you being unblocked are fairly slim given that you have repeatedly gone against Wikipedia guidelines despite repeated attempts to educate you. This shows a deliberate disregard for rules and I seriously doubt that you are here for any other agenda than your own. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:31, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]