User talk:Moppatt O'Smitty

Moppatt O'Smitty, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Moppatt O'Smitty! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Guidelines[edit]

Please have a look at WP:SPA and WP:COI.—Aquegg (talk) 21:17, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks —Aquegg. I've created a talk at the main Gearspace talk page; I understand the principle of a single topic and indeed have plans to create other pages for overlooked women in audio. With all due respect can you please tell me why you chose to request I refer to these guidelines but not Mhatma who seems in a similar boat with regard focus upon the one issue of removing the one entry?

Speedy deletion nomination of Jenny matthias[edit]

Hello Moppatt O'Smitty,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Jenny matthias for deletion in response to your request.

If you didn't intend to make such a request and don't want the article to be deleted, you can edit the page and remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 09:37, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes please delete. I had accidentally created the page with a lowercase surname.

I have also just realized I spelled her first name incorrectly. Therefore I will attempt to recreate the correct page which is Jennie Matthias and not Jenny Matthias. Once finished I will then redirect and delete this page. Can you please confirm this is the correct procedure?

Nomination of Jennie Matthias for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jennie Matthias is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jennie Matthias until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

– bradv🍁 21:22, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nile Climate Engine (May 25)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tagishsimon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Seems like an attempt at promotion for someone's project. Not what wikipedia is for.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nile Climate Engine and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nile Climate Engine, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tagishsimon (talk) 08:19, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of Moppatt O'Smitty (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Missvain (talk) 00:00, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Nile Climate Engine[edit]

Hello, Moppatt O'Smitty. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nile Climate Engine, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:01, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Moppatt O'Smitty (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Now that I have become more aquainted with rules, procedures and ways of the Wikipedia community, I understand the reasoning behind the decision to block my account. It seems I was too brash, and overly zealous Moppatt O'Smitty (talk) 15:39, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You were blocked for violating WP:SOCK but don't mention this at all in your unblock request. Yamla (talk) 15:54, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.