User talk:Moogle10000/Archive 2016 - 2012
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive |
Overtagging of Laurent Percerou
This was a well-sourced short stub. Almost all the tags you added were inappropriate. Please do not bombard articles like this (eg {{expert|date=May 2013|reason=Needs more information}} - it's a stub, and tagging it as such is all that's needed; we call on experts where there is a query about the content of an article or possibly its notability, not when there's a well-sourced very short article on an uncontroversially notable person). PamD
- There was actually a serious problem with the article, that the wrong name was in the DEFAULTSORT and the PERSONDATA, but you didn't notice that. I've fixed it. PamD 07:30, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
- Good to know that's fixed. I'll watch the tagging more closely in the future - that doesn't, however, change the status that the article is still a stub and it still needs help from an expert on French Catholic Bishops... Moogle10000 21:47, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
- It needs expansion, as do most articles in Wikipedia: it's a stub. It doesn't have any specific problem which calls for an expert on French bishops - we don't tag every one-sentence article as in need of help from subject experts. You also tagged it as "outdated", which seemed extraordinary given that he only became bishop in Feb 2013: I wonder what you meant? Just ease up on adding the tags and remember "less is more": if you assign seven tags, as well as {{stub}}, the important ones (if any) will be less likely to be noticed. PamD 21:58, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
- Good to know that's fixed. I'll watch the tagging more closely in the future - that doesn't, however, change the status that the article is still a stub and it still needs help from an expert on French Catholic Bishops... Moogle10000 21:47, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:14, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Moogle10000. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page.
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Moogle10000. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |