Jump to content

User talk:Montueswed

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Montueswed, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

May 2013

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Wildrose Party may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s and 2 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:34, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Montueswed, you are invited to the Teahouse

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Montueswed! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! TheOriginalSoni (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse
This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:17, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Blake Pedersen.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Blake Pedersen.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 18:18, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Rod Fox may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:05, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Drew Barnes may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:16, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:MLA Pat Stier.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:MLA Pat Stier.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 20:43, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

MLAs

[edit]

Just a few notes for you about your recent edits to Wildrose Party MLAs:

  1. When adding an image to the infobox, it's not necessary to thumbnail or caption it — rather, you just put the filename itself directly into the image = field and use the separate image_size = field to adjust the size if necessary. (You don't even have to actually wikilink the filename, for that matter, as the box is coded to automatically do that.) A caption isn't necessary at all if it's just going to repeat the person's name — the caption = field is useful if you want to provide additional information, such as where the photo was taken if it's from a public appearance or who's with them if they're posing with someone else, but if it's just going to repeat the same information that's already at the top of the infobox then a caption isn't needed at all.
  2. When adding references, it's not sufficient to just add a plain web URL. Web pages go down or get restructured and become dead links all the time, so we need complete citation details (i.e. the title of the article, the publication it appears in, the date it was published on, etc.) in addition to the URL itself. That way, if anything ever happens to the webpage then we can just strip the URL and still have a valid citation — whereas if something is cited just to a web URL without the additional information, then if that link ever goes dead the information has become unreferenced again.

Hope that helps a bit. Bearcat (talk) 21:42, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - will go back and clarify references.Montueswed (talk) 16:53, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:MLA Rod Fox.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, File:MLA Rod Fox.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:MLA Rod Fox.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 22:43, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Bruce Rowe.jpg

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bruce Rowe.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 22:45, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Wildrose Caucus logo.jpg

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Wildrose Caucus logo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 22:46, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Wildrose Caucus.jpg

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Wildrose Caucus.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 22:46, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Wildrose Leader Danielle Smith.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Wildrose Leader Danielle Smith.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 22:46, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Drew Barnes.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Drew Barnes.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 22:47, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Jason Hale.jpg

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jason Hale.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 22:47, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wildrose and some advice

[edit]

Hi Montueswed, I see from the image uploads that you are having some challenges getting Wikipedia's processes down. I am hoping I can help a little. As a free content project, Wikipedia's image use requirements are fairly strict. We cannot accept "Will be provided on request" to argue that permission to freely upload has been granted. It looks like you have already been pointed to WP:OTRS and have sent the evidence to that team for at least some of the images, though I note that File:Drew Barnes.jpg is still missing that notation. I do not have access to the OTRS queue so do not know the contents of whatever you sent, but the best way to ensure these images remain is to ensure that the copyright holder of the images explicitly states their willingness to release the images to a free license. The one I use for my own images is CC-BY-SA, which grants any reuser permission to use the image and create derivatives for any reason (including commercial), so long as they credit the copyright holder (which we do via the dedicated image description page) and share any derivative copies under a compatible license.

Also, I have to ask: Are you affiliated with the Wildrose Party in any fashion? If so, please read our documentation on editors with a conflict of interest. Having a COI does not disqualify you from editing the articles, but it will likely result in a higher level of scrutiny towards your edits as others wish to ensure that we retain a neutral point of view, as expressed by available secondary sources. When it doubt, it is always best to seek advice on the article's talk page, which you have been doing, or at a central noticeboard. WT:CWNB is a noticeboard for Canadian Wikipedians, and WP:NPOVN is a good overall place to seek advice if you are concerned that a proposed change or source may not be viewed as neutral.

Speaking of talk page messages, It would help if you sign your messages with four tildes (~~~~) as this will append your username and a timestamp to each message. You may have noticed that a bot has been doing it for you in the past, but it is preferable that editors sign their own posts. Thanks! Resolute 16:19, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the tips, they are appreciated.Montueswed (talk) 16:53, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
In the interests of full disclosure, I should indicate a COI, due to an employment affiliation with the official opposition in Alberta. Please note, this is not a direct party affiliation. Sorry for any confusion - new to editing and trying to figure out the etiquette and rules, which I fully respect. I realize this limits the edits that can be made. I assumed updated photos would be of interest to Wikipedia without violating neutrality - and have submitted the proper authorization as has been indicated as necessary. Likewise, the intent in updating MLA bios was to match the pages of other MLAs, many which are quite detailed and use similar sources. There is definitely no intent of 'vandalism,' but I'd like to offer suggestions for improvement on these pages, so they are similar to those of other Albertan and Canadian MLA and party pages. Montueswed (talk) 19:40, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I've dealt with the OTRS. – Connormah (talk) 21:55, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Gary Bikman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Provo
Rick Strankman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Wildrose

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:09, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jeff Wilson (politician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hinton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

[edit]

Thank you for your suggestion regarding Danielle Smith. When you believe an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes. Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the edit this page link at the top.
The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons why you might want to). Jackmcbarn (talk) 17:04, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree files

[edit]

Some of your files may be unfree. See Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2013 November 1#OTRS pending since June. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:16, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Consent declaration has been sent Nov. 5. Awaiting permission ticket.

Possibly unfree files

[edit]

Some of your images may be unfree. See Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2013 November 15#OTRS pending since August. --Stefan2 (talk) 23:52, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, OTRS has been sent November 20, 2013
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Montueswed&oldid=1067283927"