User talk:Montie12

May 2023

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Theocracy, you may be blocked from editing. CandyScythe (talk) 21:24, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sandy

Whomever posted this section in the first place is violating the neutral point of view policy.

Please can you explain why citations of two inconsequential people are being used to support a position that Israel is a Theocracy, that doesn’t even meet the definition of a Theocracy?

Why is the UK not being described as a Theocracy? Montie12 (talk) 21:31, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Theocracy. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. CandyScythe (talk) 22:27, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You need to respond to the substance of why I am making edits - per my explanations - rather than just moan about an edit war Montie12 (talk) 22:40, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Montie12 reported by User:CandyScythe (Result: ). Thank you. CandyScythe (talk) 22:40, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

IHRA definition of antisemitism: “Manifestations might include the targeting of the state of Israel, conceived as a Jewish collectivity. However, criticism of Israel similar to that leveled against any other country cannot be regarded as antisemitic.”

Source: https://www.holocaustremembrance.com/resources/working-definitions-charters/working-definition-antisemitism

Either UK and Israel are both Theocracies, or neither are.

The wiki needs to be consistent in its treatment of both countries, save itself from targeting Israel and thereby being antisemitic. Montie12 (talk) 22:52, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 22:50, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Montie12, you may use this page to make an unblock request if you wish. You may not use it for anything else, particularly making political statements. If you do, I will revoke your access to this page.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:12, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]